User Name vintage_gman
Member Since 2005-09-16
Total number of Feedback Posts: 5
Total number of comments: 0
Last 10 Feedback Posts by vintage_gman [ Search for All ]
The LoseThos Operating System 4.11 (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
Jesus, even POS Mac System 7 was better than this! ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Revisit 1984 all over again with this pathetic ancient looking "OS". Never mind, nothing here to even bother with, just keep moving on. [alert admin]
Sunday, August 03 2008 @ 09:53 PM PDT
Free Fire Screensaver 2.0 (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
'nuf said [alert admin]
Sunday, August 03 2008 @ 09:25 PM PDT
This Day in Apple History 1.0 (Mac OS X)
Does It Display What OS X BUGS or Faulty Hardware Apple Released "Today" ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.... THAT would be a VERY thick calendar of events! Like: Monday, June 1998 - Apple releases new G3 PowerBook, hinges will break, speakers will fail, oh and Apple will fail to support after promising OS X 10.1.x will. Tuesday, January 2000 - Apple releases G4 PowerBook, hinges STILL break, Titanium paint will flake - peal - chip, WiFi reception will suck and many LCD's will fail just after the warranty expires. or Today - iPhoto 6.0 (#5): Lost calendar; Print quality complaints. Lost calendar Several readers have reported an issue where iPhoto 6.0 spontaneously loses stored calendar data. or Yesterday - Intel-based Macs: Networking Issues (#5): Another performance solution; Problems connecting to servers (Information kindly provided by macfixit.com) [alert admin]
Tuesday, February 07 2006 @ 09:46 PM PST
Celestia 1.4 (Mac OS X)
Celestia is a Piece of Crap .... crashes OS X 10.2.x and 10.3.x on three diff Macs! ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Don't waste you're time on this POS poorly written (and obviously un-tested) Astro program! [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info | 0 of 6 users found this helpful
Monday, January 02 2006 @ 12:25 PM PST
iPodDisk 1.0 (Mac OS X)
WHY NOT Continue to Support 10.2 and 10.3.x!!?? ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I've used this in older versions when it still supported 10.2.x and 10.3.x. ONLY 1/2 of Mac users have migrated to 10.4.x and it is a great disservice when developers stop supporting older commonly used OS X versions. Don't fall pray to the same rude abandonment of legacy users that Apple has exhibited over the last decade plus (which coincides with the return of Stevie Greedy Jobs and the iTunes business model). With OS X for PPC a dead-end street, why would I or anyone invest in an upgrade to a buggy 10.4 anyway? When Developers pull this exclusionary production, my and your Donations should stop! [alert admin]
Read Comments (3) | More Info | 0 of 6 users found this helpful
Monday, January 02 2006 @ 12:08 PM PST
Last 10 Comments by vintage_gman [ Search for All ]
No user comments.