Existing users, 
User Name tedd
Member Since 2000-02-08
Total number of Feedback Posts: 13
Total number of comments: 0
Last 10 Feedback Posts by tedd [ Search for All ]
Adobe Bridge CS3 2.1 (Mac OS X)
And this is supposed to do what? 
This update diding do anything other than to say it had an error trying to find which application it needed to update. Geezz, if it can't what Adobe it needs to update, then how do you know that it's doing the right thng when it does? Forget this update and save yourself wondering what happened. [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 2 of 2 users found this helpful
Monday, October 22 2007 @ 10:25 AM PDT
Scorpion BarCode 1.90 (Mac OS 9, Mac OS X)
If you use bar code, you need this.
Subject line says it all -- great product. [alert admin]
Saturday, October 20 2007 @ 05:19 PM PDT
VueScan 8.4.42 (Mac OS X)
It doesn't get any better than this. [alert admin]
Saturday, October 20 2007 @ 05:14 PM PDT
iPhoto Library Manager 3.3.3 (Mac OS X)
A very cool program and well worth the price. I don't understand why Apple hasn't incorporated this into iPhoto. This completes iPhoto for me. [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 2 of 2 users found this helpful
Saturday, October 20 2007 @ 04:54 PM PDT
Symantec Norton AntiVirus 9.0.3 (Mac OS X)
Hi: I purchased Norton Utilities for the Macintosh within the last six months -- it came in a two pack with both the Utilities and the Anti-virus packages bound together. The Utility version says its' 8.0.2 and the AntiVirus version says it's 9.0.3. The "Live Update" for the virus always reports that it just downloaded 8.3MB of new Virus Defs, but it always reports that -- over and over again. That doesn't instill me with confidence that I am actually getting the most current virus update. Version Tracker states that the most current version for AntiVirus is 10.0.0.1, but clicking the "Download" in Version Tracker dumps you to Symantec's web site showing Norton AntiVirus is 10.0, but no clear way to upgrade from 9 to 10. I'm frustrated -- the product never worked as advertised -- and, I'm not confident that the newer version will work any better. This is not my first purchase of this product type from Norton (with over ten years of purchases), but I think it will be my last. tedd tedd@sperling.com [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Tuesday, October 18 2005 @ 10:16 AM PDT
CocoaMySQL 0.5 (Mac OS X)
While I have several applications that connect to my server (such as, Fetch, Browsers, GoLive, Dreamweaver, etc.), this critter couldn't connect -- and, if it doesn't connect, then nothing else matters.
To bad, it looks like a nice piece of software, but falls considerably short on documentation and doing what it says it can do..
tedd
[alert admin]Read Comments (2) | More Info | 0 of 4 users found this helpful
Saturday, January 29 2005 @ 08:36 AM PST
Adobe SVG Viewer X 3.0 (Mac OS X)
Hi:
I'm sure that this would be a great plug-in, if it worked. The point is that Apple's current Safari (v1.2.4) won't use it. While it will acknowledge that it has the plug-in installed, it will not use the plug-in to view any svg files. So, what's the point?
tedd [alert admin]Read Comments (1) | More Info
Monday, January 03 2005 @ 06:04 PM PST
FutureBASIC 4.0r1 (Mac OS 9, Mac OS X)
I highly recommend FutureBasic (all versions). I've been using FB for over ten years and am very impressed with both the language and the level of technical support -- which in my opinion are simply the best available.
I've programmed in numerous other languages (including C++) and find that FB is the best supported, not only by its makers (i.e., Staz Software), but by other FB programmers via the FB list server. The list server has literally hundreds of FB programmers (including Staz) attending and answering all types of questions from newbie level to advanced leading-edge specifics. I find that the followers of FB are a religious cult of fine professional people passionately dedicated to supporting FB -- they are in affect a mirror of the product they support.
As for FB not providing OOP support, I take that as a plus! FB provides a truly RAD environment for creating fast Macintosh applications in a fraction of the time to do the same thing in C++. As for large projects, which require large development teams, then OOP may have some validity, but for every application that I've been involved with, there hasn't been a single problem that FB hasn't provided an easy way to accomplish. In fact, when clients hire me to write in C++, I often turn to FB to create demo's for their approval before starting. I wish more clients would just concentrate on what they wanted instead of picking what language their application should be developed in,
So, in my opinion, if you want to do serious Mac development, or even learn basic programming, then you can do no better than FutureBasic.
tedd
[alert admin]Post a comment | More Info | 3 of 3 users found this helpful
Monday, December 27 2004 @ 07:23 AM PST
VueScan 7.6.69 (Mac OS X)
It don't better than this. Whatever you want to do, this does it. [alert admin]
Saturday, December 06 2003 @ 10:50 AM PST
SiteSucker 1.5.1 (Mac OS 9, Mac OS X)
Hi: This is a great little program -- it does exactly what it says it will do. If you want to get (download) everything that is on a web site, then this baby will do it for you. No more guessing at what may be there, this program finds everything and download accordingly. In my opinion, it's a "must have" for any web developer that wants to see how the other guy did something. A bit sneaky, but if you don't want it made public, then don't put it on the net. tedd@spamcop.net [alert admin]
Saturday, December 06 2003 @ 10:08 AM PST
Last 10 Comments by tedd [ Search for All ]
No user comments.
