Existing users, 
Advanced SearchUser Name rustik_one
Member Since 2004-10-27
Total number of Feedback Posts: 5
Total number of comments: 1
Last 10 Feedback Posts by rustik_one [ Search for All ]
dBpowerAMP Music Converter 11.0 (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
r11 drops MP3 support. find a copy of r10 while u can! [alert admin]
Monday, November 29 2004 @ 09:35 AM PST
dBpowerAMP Music Converter 11.0 (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
as of this post, the file posted is version 10. interested parties may download the correct version by following the link to the developer's site above, until this is fixed. [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info
Monday, November 29 2004 @ 08:08 AM PST
Norton Internet Security 2004 7.0.3.8 (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
Norton Antivirus, predated by only by McAfee & several extinct others, has been and will remain one of the two most stable, effective, updated, and complete choices for PC virus protection. I've read multiple snivels about its size, resource consumption, and price. It's big because it needs to be. It needs resources because it does a more in-depth and thorough job than ever before, and is designed for modern systems, not your PII MMX running Windows 98 with 64MB of RAM. And it's expensive because the research, developement, testing, and updates that make it a superior product cost money, which is the same reason it's lesser competitors are, in fact, lesser. Combined with the suite of protections included in Norton Internet Security, it's the best you can buy for a home PC. As for spin-off comments regarding Windows XP security issues, again I refer to the history of the author-company, the cost of producing a superior product, and a seemingly unknown feature called Windows Update for security complaints as they arise. If you're too cheap to pay-up for the big boys, or the hardware to run `em, just say so; don't bash them. If they are so bad, explain their sales numbers, (without referring to unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, if possible). [alert admin]
Wednesday, October 27 2004 @ 01:04 PM PDT
Symantec Norton AntiVirus 2005 11.0 (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
Norton Antivirus, predated by only by McAfee & several extinct others, has been and will remain one of the two most stable, effective, updated, and complete choices for PC virus protection. I've read multiple snivels about its size, resource consumption, and price. It's big because it needs to be. It needs resources because it does a more in-depth and thorough job than ever before, and is designed for modern systems, not your PII MMX running Windows 98 with 64MB of RAM. And it's expensive because the research, developement, testing, and updates that make it a superior product cost money, which is the same reason it's lesser competitors are, in fact, lesser. Combined with the suite of protections included in Norton Internet Security, it's the best you can buy for a home PC. As for spin-off comments regarding Windows XP security issues, again I refer to the history of the author-company, the cost of producing a superior product, and a seemingly unknown feature called Windows Update for security complaints as they arise. If you're too cheap to pay-up for the big boys, or the hardware to run `em, just say so; don't bash them. If they are so bad, explain their sales numbers, (without referring to unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, if possible). [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Wednesday, October 27 2004 @ 01:03 PM PDT
Norton AntiVirus Virus Definition May (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
Norton Antivirus, predated by only by McAfee & several extinct others, has been and will remain one of the two most stable, effective, updated, and complete choices for PC virus protection. I've read multiple snivels about its size, resource consumption, and price. It's big because it needs to be. It needs resources because it does a more in-depth and thorough job than ever before, and is designed for modern systems, not your PII MMX running Windows 98 with 64MB of RAM. And it's expensive because the research, developement, testing, and updates that make it a superior product cost money, which is the same reason it's lesser competitors are, in fact, lesser. Combined with the suite of protections included in Norton Internet Security, it's the best you can buy for a home PC. As for spin-off comments regarding Windows XP security issues, again I refer to the history of the author-company, the cost of producing a superior product, and a seemingly unknown feature called Windows Update for security complaints as they arise. If you're too cheap to pay-up for the big boys, or the hardware to run `em, just say so; don't bash them. If they are so bad, explain their sales numbers, (without referring to unsubstantiated conspiracy theories, if possible). [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info | 6 of 7 users found this helpful
Wednesday, October 27 2004 @ 12:58 PM PDT
Last 10 Comments by rustik_one [ Search for All ]
i posted earlier that the earlier version - r10 - was linked above, rather than r11. well, i was right, and very, very wrong. the earlier version included the ability to convert to MP3 format without charge using the free lame3 MP3 codec, while r11 no longer includes the MP3 capabilities - unless you buy a licensed codec. ergo, r10 is in fact the RIGHT version, overall, in that it's totally free, MP3 capable, and still…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Monday, November 29 2004 @ 09:32 AM PST
