Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

User Profile for ende

User Name ende

Member Since 2002-03-23

Total number of Feedback Posts: 105

Total number of comments: 18

Last 10 Feedback Posts by ende  [ Search for All ]

Epson Stylus Color 1160 1.2bA (Mac OS X)

Why...  

... does Epson ship a .sea.hqx which contains an installer which 'installs' a dmg on your desktop which contains the real installer which install the driver without telling you what and where? [alert admin]

Post a comment | More Info

Wednesday, January 17 2007 @ 04:43 AM PST

LiteSpeed Web Server 2.2.6 (Mac OS X)

If you're on Rails…  

… LiteSpeed is really worth a trial. The free version mainly doesn't allow serving pr0n but any other commercial stuff is ok. [alert admin]

Post a comment | More Info

Wednesday, November 29 2006 @ 12:13 AM PST

Photo to Movie 4.0.2 (Mac OS X)

WTF?  

the developer rates his own software!? [alert admin]

Read Comments (2) | More Info

Saturday, September 16 2006 @ 02:27 PM PDT

iTunes Remote Control 1.0 (Mac OS X)

nice. unobstrusive. free.  

but i like the interface of remote remote (http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/25736) better: it's more consistent (p.e. playlist + trackselecter) and the playlistselecter is better (it highlights the currently playing playlist when expanding). and remote remote allow one to sleep the remote computer, to add/remove tracks to/from playlists... [alert admin]

Post a comment | More Info  |  1 of 2 users found this helpful

Monday, May 01 2006 @ 03:37 AM PDT

Remote Remote 0.9.3b (Mac OS X)

it would be nice...  

...if there was an option for the volume-controller to effect the systems volume. i run itunes, eyetv, vlc and dvd-player on my livingroom cube and like to change just the systems overall volume rather than having to deal with the volume-fader of each programm individually. [alert admin]

Post a comment | More Info

Sunday, April 30 2006 @ 08:04 AM PDT

Remote Remote 0.9.3b (Mac OS X)

nice. smooth. unobstrusive. free.  

nt. [alert admin]

Post a comment | More Info

Saturday, April 29 2006 @ 04:41 AM PDT

Minuteur 4.5.3 (Mac OS X)

nice!  

best of the bunch, me thinkin. price is right. [alert admin]

Post a comment | More Info

Sunday, April 02 2006 @ 04:03 AM PDT

Licensed 1.0b1 (Mac OS X)

nice!  

used to keep the order-emails woth the licenses in a special mailbox (and i think i will continue to do so) but licensed is much more convenient. suggestions: - make licensed remember my email-choice. i always use the same email for software-registration but licensed keeps suggesting another mailadress. - make licensed autocomplete fields based on the info.plists in the app-bundles for version, company name, url, ... - make the fileds adoptable (add custom fields / remove fields) still: nice little software. [alert admin]

Post a comment | More Info  |  1 of 1 users found this helpful

Wednesday, March 29 2006 @ 01:53 PM PST

Paparazzi! 0.4.3 (Mac OS X)

for the records:  

i'm not related to the developer of this program. this program does NOT do the same thing as print -> save as pdf if the webpage is longer than one printed page. if you print and save as pdf the result gets split to as many pages as needed for printing. this program preserves you from printing to pdf or doing several screenshots and the stitching the result together. i commented this once in the past but ppl just don't get it. is there any way to make this comment stay on the top? lets repeat together: Paparazzi does NOT do the same thing as print to pdf. Paparazzi does NOT do the same thing as print to pdf. Paparazzi does NOT do the same thing as print to pdf. if the developer of this program reads this: please put a remark like this into the description of paparazzi. this cool program deserves to be understood. [alert admin]

Post a comment | More Info

Thursday, March 23 2006 @ 12:07 PM PST

LightZone 1.2 (Mac OS X)

i really like the approach of this one!  

this programm uses a unique approach to photo-editing (at least to my knowledge). it is easy to use. it needs some work, though. if you do a lot of photo-work, its worth trying. details: - the zone-model is super. much easier to handle than photoshop curves. takes some time to get used to. - the work with region is fun. not like photoshop masks. some work must be done here: - add a healing-brush! - IMHO an imagebowser needs a fast preview for selecting the keepers and sorting the photos. - how do you view just the jpgs if you have a folder full of jpgs and raws? in LZ you can't search for a certain "kind" of file, can you? the column.view doesn't have a "kind"-column? why that? i tried to accomplish this by searching for photos with a size less than 3MB... it didn't find the jpgs, either. - did i say: add a healing-brush? yes. anyway. that important! so: add a healing-brush! feature-requests. - i LOVE photomechanics combined raw+jpg view. please add this to lightzone. - add a highlight and shadow warning to the zonemapper. its too easy to blow the highlights there. - make the feathering area not just resizable, but movable (inside the region). and better: make it possible to convert the feathering area into a spline/polygon with ajustable single points. - the imagebrowser is slow. at least compared with photomechanic. but i never saw other imagebrowsers on the mac which are not. - loading images for editing isn't exactly fast, either. i trust LZ method of saving the changes to a raw file into a file much more than apertures method of saving these things into a database: what if the DB gets corrupted? how do i transfer these setting between computers? how can i make incemental backups? some core-image magic would do wonders with the speeds-issues... i suppose, thats not possible with a java-application. is it? isn't photomechanic java, too? it doesn't use core-image, but its fast as hell... hm... for all the brave ppl who read this far, here the gratification. http://www.outbackphoto.com/booklets/booklets.html has a 50 bucks discount on LZ. i really consider buying LZ. a planned-features announcement would help in the descission. n. [alert admin]

Read Comments (3) | More Info  |  3 of 3 users found this helpful

Saturday, March 18 2006 @ 04:30 PM PST

Last 10 Comments by ende  [ Search for All ]

Wrong! Paparazzi does it for free!  

nt.

Original feedback item : Read More

Sunday, April 16 2006 @ 08:39 AM PDT

do you have filevault activated?  

perhaps you deleted the encrypted diskimage filefault creates to secure the data?

Original feedback item : Read More

Monday, April 10 2006 @ 01:31 AM PDT

actually: nobody!  

nobody wants to download textmate JUST to read whats new... everybody wants to download textmate, get excited, install the new version immediatelly, look for obviously new features and then read whats new. ;)

Original feedback item : Read More

Tuesday, April 04 2006 @ 08:32 AM PDT

extra d**p. its FREE!  

this program is FREE.

Original feedback item : Read More

Thursday, March 23 2006 @ 12:08 PM PST

more wishes:  

- faster zooming - the region-paradigm is so powerfull. please: - make the regions better ajustable. p.e. make it possible to move active points via cursor-keys. - make effects groupable to groups which use the same region.

Original feedback item : Read More

Sunday, March 19 2006 @ 01:21 PM PST

more wishes:  

- faster zooming - the region-paradigm is so powerfull. please: - make the regions better ajustable. p.e. make it possible to move active points via cursor-keys. - make effects groupable to groups which use the same region.

Original feedback item : Read More

Sunday, March 19 2006 @ 01:19 PM PST

RE: i don't understand.  

obviously! ever tried to include the output of a safari into another webpage?

Original feedback item : Read More

Tuesday, February 28 2006 @ 01:33 PM PST

a third thing:  

- make it snap to the background when [escape] is pressed.

Original feedback item : Read More

Saturday, November 19 2005 @ 11:43 AM PST

Improvement for video  

just "write" a small automator-action or apple-script and let it be triggered by a folder-action.

Original feedback item : Read More

Thursday, October 20 2005 @ 03:29 PM PDT

hmmm....  

perhaps we work this out. i get completely different results.

with safari + print + save as pdf

with firefox + print + save as pdf

with paparazzi

for me, all three look different.

Original feedback item : Read More

Tuesday, August 16 2005 @ 12:49 AM PDT