Existing users, 
Advanced SearchUser Name eboychik
Member Since 2003-07-17
Total number of Feedback Posts: 43
Total number of comments: 11
Last 10 Feedback Posts by eboychik [ Search for All ]
maintain1 8.7 (Mac OS X)
The link here and on the developer's site both give you a .dmg file which is labeled version 8.4 pro, not version 8.7 [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info | 1 of 1 users found this helpful
Friday, December 07 2007 @ 09:58 PM PST
Timbuktu Pro 8.7 (Mac OS X)
Not only is the upgrade process really frustrating (I had to go back to my original 2003 email to find the serial and activation numbers, then the upgrade link was incorrect) but it doesn't even open in Leo-pard. It bounces several times in the dock...then it disappears. Hope they fix it soon. [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info | 1 of 1 users found this helpful
Monday, October 29 2007 @ 05:12 PM PDT
Apple Front Row 1.3.1 (Mac OS X)
tells me it won't install on any of my drives, even though I have an intel imac. [alert admin]
Read Comments (4) | More Info | 0 of 2 users found this helpful
Wednesday, August 08 2007 @ 06:18 AM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5060.0 (Mac OS X)
Version 2 was great, but version 3 has become bloatware. The last one took forever to load and froze or slowed my 2GB iMac to a crawl, but this one gives me a "memory allocation' error at start up, which is suppoed to be solved by checking a box that will fix it in preferences, but which does absolutely nothing! Rebooting makes nodifference. This is now a brick. [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 1 of 3 users found this helpful
Friday, August 03 2007 @ 08:33 PM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5060.0 (Mac OS X)
Version 2 was great, but version 3 has become bloatware. The last one took forever to load and froze or slowed my 2GB iMac to a crawl, but this one gives me a "memory allocation' error at start up, which is suppoed to be solved by checking a box that will fix it in preferences, but which does absolutely nothing! Rebooting makes nodifference. This is now a brick. [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Friday, August 03 2007 @ 06:34 AM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5060.0 (Mac OS X)
can't even start windows now with this build 
Version 2 was great. Version 3 is bloatware. This new version tells me that Parallels didn't properly load memory allocation, and to check a box in preferences to allow this to happen automatically. Unfortunately, that makes no difference - Parallels is now dead in the water. VMWare Fusion, anyone? Much smaller RAM requirement, too, according to Walt Mossberg. [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Friday, August 03 2007 @ 06:33 AM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5060.0 (Mac OS X)
can't even start windows now with this build
Version 2 was great. Version 3 is bloatware. This new version tells me that Parallels didn't properly load memory allocation, and to check a box in preferences to allow this to happen automatically. Unfortunately, that makes no difference - Parallels is now dead in the water. VMWare Fusion, anyone? Much smaller RAM requirement, too, according to Walt Mossberg. [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Friday, August 03 2007 @ 06:31 AM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5060.0 (Mac OS X)
can't even start windows now with this build
Version 2 was great. Version 3 is bloatware. This new version tells me that Parallels didn't properly load memory allocation, and to check a box in preferences to allow this to happen automatically. Unfortunately, that makes no difference - Parallels is now dead in the water. VMWare Fusion, anyone? Much smaller RAM requirement, too, according to Walt Mossberg. [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Friday, August 03 2007 @ 06:28 AM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5060.0 (Mac OS X)
can't even start windows now with this build
Version 2 was great. Version 3 is bloatware. This new version tells me that Parallels didn't properly load memory allocation, and to check a box in preferences to allow this to happen automatically. Unfortunately, that makes no difference - Parallels is now dead in the water. VMWare Fusion, anyone? Much smaller RAM requirement, too, according to Walt Mossberg. [alert admin]
Friday, August 03 2007 @ 06:26 AM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5060.0 (Mac OS X)
can't even start windows now with this build
Version 2 was great. Version 3 is bloatware. This new version tells me that Parallels didn't properly load memory allocation, and to check a box in preferences to allow this to happen automatically. Unfortunately, that makes no difference - Parallels is now dead in the water. VMWare Fusion, anyone? Much smaller RAM requirement, too, according to Walt Mossberg. [alert admin]
Friday, August 03 2007 @ 06:12 AM PDT
Last 10 Comments by eboychik [ Search for All ]
Worst customer service imaginable
NO customer service is more like it. And the amount of spam and spyware downloads that they allow is unconscionable. They do NOT reply to emails! They used to be good, but now they aren't worth a nickel. Total POS.
Original feedback item : Read More
Wednesday, July 23 2008 @ 10:54 PM PDT
Well, yeah. It came with a remote, and the remote lets me control play and pause and volume in iTunes, slideshows in iPhoto, etc. just can't even find front row in my system.
Original feedback item : Read More
Thursday, August 09 2007 @ 08:52 PM PDT
I don't have remote buddy.
Original feedback item : Read More
Wednesday, August 08 2007 @ 09:20 PM PDT
Absolutely impossible to download
Previous sugestion was togo the developer's mac homepgae to download, but that takes you to the same place that won;t download correctly in the first place. Download (eventually, slowly) makes it 99.9% of the way, and then I get a "POSIX error. Connection reset by peer"
Original feedback item : Read More
Saturday, April 29 2006 @ 05:13 AM PDT
Absolutely impossible to downloadf
Link stalls, fails, stops, dies, and is generally useless. I'm a paid, registered customer, and I can't get the freakin' update. Just plain stupid
Original feedback item : Read More
Friday, April 28 2006 @ 07:49 PM PDT
Absolutely impossible to downloadf
Link stalls, fails, stops, dies, and is generally useless. I'm a paid, registered customer, and I can't get the freakin' update. Just plain stupid
Original feedback item : Read More
Friday, April 28 2006 @ 07:49 PM PDT
It would certainly be more user-friendly if, when faced with a site trying to download a cookie, you could choose to add it to the white list or to reject it via a pop-up menu. Further, I don;t want every cookie from, say, Yahoo! I don't want 'servedbyadvertising' cookies, etc. Other programs for other browsers let me select each and every cookie to accept or reject.
Original feedback item : Read More
Sunday, December 18 2005 @ 12:05 PM PST
How do I uninstall these settings?
How do you know that uninstalls it?
Original feedback item : Read More
Tuesday, November 29 2005 @ 07:16 AM PST
How do I uninstall these settings?
How do you know that uninstalls it?
Original feedback item : Read More
Tuesday, November 29 2005 @ 07:16 AM PST
I had the same experience. I had 7.0.3. The update installed 7.0.0! After restarting, and again trying to update, I still was no better off. I deleted the 7.0.0 folder and checked for updates via the 7.0.3 version itself, and there was no update available. I think that probably Adobe acrobat upgraded to 7.0.5, so they renamed all the versions of its components, like Reader, to 7.0.5 even though they didn't actually change the version…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Thursday, October 13 2005 @ 05:45 PM PDT
