User Name chandivine
Member Since 2005-12-14
Total number of Feedback Posts: 6
Total number of comments: 4
Last 10 Feedback Posts by chandivine [ Search for All ]
SilverFast Ai (Epson) 6.5.r6 (Mac OS X)
Just downloaded the latest Version. Love it! That Calibration is amazing! Stable and super fast. Well done! [alert admin]
Wednesday, May 09 2007 @ 01:35 PM PDT
SilverFast Ai (Umax) Powerlook 6.5 (Mac OS X)
Have been using SilverFast for some time now. I love the new v6.5! I am using it with my Powerlook- the newly added film negative profiles helped me out a lot. I appreciate the software and can reccomend it to anyone. Chandivine [alert admin]
Wednesday, January 03 2007 @ 08:06 AM PST
SilverFast Ai (Epson) Perfection 4870 6.4.4r7 (Mac OS 9, Mac OS X)
I am impressed by what SilferFast does to my scanner. Way better than Epson SW - alone the Multi-Sampling functions turns my Epson into a real HighEnd scanner. Absolutely reccomended! Thanks! [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Wednesday, November 22 2006 @ 08:33 AM PST
SilverFast (Leaf) Leafscan 45 6.4.4r2 (Mac OS X)
I just want to say that my long-lost Leaf 45 is now finally in use again. After several years of dust collecting in my basement, I am now finally able to use it again. I am using SilverFast with the IT8 Calibration and am getting great results. Highly reccomended! [alert admin]
Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 04:30 PM PDT
SilverFast Ai (Nikon) LS 8000/9000 ED 6.4.2r9 (Mac OS 9, Mac OS X)
I loved the Software with this scanner. Great results, great colour. Good value in my eyes - the money I spent on the Software has already easily paid itsself with the amount of time I save. The JobManager rocks ! - My 2 cents! [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 2 of 2 users found this helpful
Tuesday, February 14 2006 @ 11:42 PM PST
SilverFast Ai STUDIO 6.4.2r9 (Mac OS X)
Finally!! I am using the SilverFast HDR Studio / Topaz bundle. Needless to say that after years of nothingness I am pleased to finally find a solution that operates under Mac OSX. The Job Manager and the HiRepp functions are increasing production speed; JPEG2000 lets me send large files with almost no loss of information over the internet. Great work ! Thank you. Chan [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 2 of 2 users found this helpful
Wednesday, December 14 2005 @ 05:34 PM PST
Last 10 Comments by chandivine [ Search for All ]
Hey, I thought I'd give m2c on this.... The pricing they offer depends of what exactly the upgrade includes - if the scanner you are upgrading supports the Multi-Exposure feature, it costs an additional fee. As I understand it this feature varies in price for SE-Plus and Studio versions. i.e. You pay amount X for the upgrade within the same product family, and in some cases an additional fee for scanners and versions that include the Multi-Exposure…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Wednesday, January 17 2007 @ 12:08 PM PST
Hey, I thought I'd give m2c on this.... The pricing they offer depends of what exactly the upgrade includes - if the scanner you are upgrading supports the Multi-Exposure feature, it costs an additional fee. As I understand it this feature varies in price for SE-Plus and Studio versions. i.e. You pay amount X for the upgrade within the same product family, and in some cases an additional fee for scanners and versions that include the Multi-Exposure…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Wednesday, January 17 2007 @ 12:07 PM PST
Hey, I thought I'd give m2c on this.... The pricing they offer depends of what exactly the upgrade includes - if the scanner you are upgrading supports the Multi-Exposure feature, it costs an additional fee. As I understand it this feature varies in price for SE-Plus and Studio versions. i.e. You pay amount X for the upgrade within the same product family, and in some cases an additional fee for scanners and versions that include the Multi-Exposure…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Wednesday, January 17 2007 @ 12:07 PM PST
..tried, printed...deleted. Not nearly as powerful. Thanks, but No Thanks!
Original feedback item : Read More
Wednesday, January 03 2007 @ 08:10 AM PST