User Name PeteRanz
Member Since 2005-03-04
Total number of Feedback Posts: 2
Total number of comments: 0
Last 10 Feedback Posts by PeteRanz [ Search for All ]
Radiotracker 1.3.0 (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
I prefer the premium version after I have tested the standard, because for me it was very important that I can have besides the mass of shoutcast stations individual favourites and filter functions. The standard version provides partly such functions. Only the premium version have full functionality. If you do not need such functionality the standard version is a excellent and stabil tool to get very fast very much music. [alert admin]
Monday, March 07 2005 @ 02:25 AM PST
Radiotracker 1.3.0 (Windows NT, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows XP, Windows 2000)
Premium version: artists & title picking
I bought after testing the Standard version. With the Premium upgrade it is possible to get & save favoured artits and titles. That is great. Also it is possible to work with favourite stations besides the genre stations. It is important that you choose with options your favourites AND limit the bandwith. F. e. 4 favourite stations with 128 kBit/s = bandwith 512 kBit/s. If you limit the bandwith this way you will get only your 4 favourite stations. In general I am a fan of radiotracker, because the handling is mostly very easy and the features are special. Other streaming software that I have tested often have two problems: 1) not enough or bad radio stations for streaming 2) handling is bad. Radiotracker uses 8.000 shoutcast radiostations AND is easy to use. [alert admin]
Monday, March 07 2005 @ 02:19 AM PST
Last 10 Comments by PeteRanz [ Search for All ]
No user comments.