Existing users, 
Advanced Search
User Name MaiTaiBook
Member Since 2003-04-27
Total number of Feedback Posts: 27
Total number of comments: 16
Last 10 Feedback Posts by MaiTaiBook [ Search for All ]
BatChmod 1.51 (Mac OS X)
It's good seeing this product being updated, even if it's for no other reason than remind us how far along OS X has come. Legions of people downloaded this helpful app "back in the day", as at times, it was the ONLY way we could empty the Trash! Did anyone else, upon using OS X 10.0 - 10.1 for the first time, have the feeling that Apple had lost their collective minds? Anywho... Good to see BatChmod still lives, but for me at least, it's GREAT that I no longer require it. :-) [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 1 of 3 users found this helpful
Wednesday, May 07 2008 @ 09:54 AM PDT
BatChmod 1.51 (Mac OS X)
It's good seeing this product being updated, even if it's for no other reason than remind us how far along OS X has come. Legions of people downloaded this helpful app "back in the day", as at times, it was the ONLY way we could empty the Trash! Did anyone else, upon using OS X 10.0 - 10.1 for the first time, have the feeling that Apple had lost their collective minds? Anywho... Good to see BatChmod still lives, but for me at least, it's GREAT that I no longer require it. :-) [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 1 of 3 users found this helpful
Wednesday, May 07 2008 @ 09:54 AM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5584.0 (Mac OS X)
Running on a 1st gen Macbook Pro with 1.25gb ram. Time from clicking icon in Dock to program launch, 9 second. Time to boot a fresh session of XP to the XP desktop, 53 seconds. Time to suspend my XP session, 9 seconds. Time to restore my suspended session, 11 seconds. Every program I'm running runs reasonably well, Activity Monitor shows Parallels taking approx 30-75% CPU utilization and 385MB RAM. Quite simply couldn't be happier with Parallels, only wish is that I didn't need it! [alert admin]
Monday, January 21 2008 @ 12:00 AM PST
LogMeIn 4.00.684 (Mac OS X)
Is this something like the "Back to my Mac" feature that's included with Leopard? I'm using "Back to my Mac" right now, and I love it! [alert admin]
Tuesday, December 04 2007 @ 09:01 PM PST
SRS iWOW 2.0 (Mac OS X)
It's fixed, it works, and it rocks. Go get it! [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info | 1 of 2 users found this helpful
Thursday, November 01 2007 @ 05:17 PM PDT
SRS iWOW 2.0 (Mac OS X)
It's fixed, it works, and it rocks. Go get it! [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Thursday, November 01 2007 @ 05:13 PM PDT
SRS iWOW 2.0 (Mac OS X)
It's fixed, it works, and it rocks. Go get it! [alert admin]
Thursday, November 01 2007 @ 04:38 PM PDT
SRS iWOW 2.0 (Mac OS X)
It's fixed, it works, and it rocks. Go get it! [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Thursday, November 01 2007 @ 04:36 PM PDT
Parallels Desktop 3.0 Build 5540 (Mac OS X)
Works as least as good as the last beta... plus, I got my C: drive icon back! Just did the Leopard thing last night, and no amount of uninstalling or reinstalling Parallels made a difference. The drive was GONE. New beta and everything is back to normal. [alert admin]
Monday, October 29 2007 @ 07:48 PM PDT
SRS iWOW 2.0 (Mac OS X)
Response to my email sez... "We are currently working to find a fix as quickly as possible and hope to have it up no later than Wed Oct 31st. Once again I apologize for the inconvenience." Cool beans [alert admin]
Monday, October 29 2007 @ 05:14 PM PDT
Last 10 Comments by MaiTaiBook [ Search for All ]
Not worth the hassle or the $$$
Sorry, but my iPhone is running 1.1.4, and iToner works as advertised. Also, I've added, subtracted and added yet again more tones, and not once has iToner "wiped" anything off my iPhone. My experience with iToner has been that it WORKS, and it works perfectly.
Original feedback item : Read More
Monday, May 19 2008 @ 01:26 PM PDT
The only thing causing a "lack of decent imagery of Canada" is the lack of decent imagery IN Canada ;-)
Original feedback item : Read More
Wednesday, April 16 2008 @ 12:40 PM PDT
On the flipside... I too have been using Parallels since it's inception, and have never encountered a problem with the product that wasn't easily solved by their support team. As for installing Parallels, I really don't know how it could be easier. All I've ever done, was to double-click the icon labelled "Install Parallels Desktop" then follow the prompts. Anyways... Parallels is currently running on a slew of machines in our company, ranging from lowly Macbooks to MacBook Pros…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Thursday, February 21 2008 @ 07:41 PM PST
Did not fix ATI Radeon 9600 screen flash
Hmmm... I work with roughly 150 G5's, and none of our ATI Radeon 9600's ever had the problem you're describing, and none of them have the issue after installing the updates. Are you certain you don't have a hardware defect?
Original feedback item : Read More
Monday, February 11 2008 @ 12:00 AM PST
There is no such thing as an "in spec" iBook, as iBooks are PPC based. Parallels requires an Intel processor, and every bit of published material clearly and plainly states so. If you mis-spoke and meant "MacBook", I apologize (though Parallels has been successfully deployed on ALL of our MacBooks), but if you really meant "iBook", then your review is meaningless as you didn't read the product requirements.
Original feedback item : Read More
Sunday, November 25 2007 @ 07:03 AM PST
For those of you that prefer to rant (without bothering with details such as facts), the HACKS to the iPhone were made possible because of a SECURITY FLAW in iPhones software. Since Apple is somewhat obligated to fix FLAWS which could COMPROMISE MY DATA, I, for one, have NO PROBLEM awaiting the SDK that'll allow REAL 3RD PARTY SOFTWARE to be written. Tell ya what... for those of you that'd rather complain about Apple fixing buffer overflows…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Friday, November 09 2007 @ 05:18 PM PST
DO NOT PURCHASE! They will Rip You Off.
I purchased the iWow software and SRS Labs didn't rip me off, therefore you are a liar.
Original feedback item : Read More
Sunday, November 04 2007 @ 05:30 AM PST
Does not work with Leopard....
Say wha? Using it on Leopard, with no real issues, on; MacBook Pro 17" PowerBook G4 17" MacBook PowerMac G5 DP2.0 AND my PowerMac G4 Dual 800 (installed via FW target mode, using my PowerBook)
Original feedback item : Read More
Sunday, October 28 2007 @ 05:52 AM PDT
WARNING: MacBook Pro keyboard not recognized any more with Leopard!
Sorry... But I'm typing this response to you from my newly upgraded 17" MacBook Pro, and there are no prob's whatsoever with my keyboard.
Original feedback item : Read More
Friday, October 26 2007 @ 03:51 PM PDT
It'd be difficult to be buggier than the last release... since it's the exact same file. b4 is the exact same build as b1 (18274), same file size, everything. Go ahead. Click "Get Info" on beta 1 and beta 4. They're the same program. Only the license agreements have been changed. Shame on you, Yahoo
Original feedback item : Read More
Sunday, June 17 2007 @ 01:57 PM PDT
