Existing users, 
User Name MacAdict4Life
Member Since 2000-02-21
Total number of Feedback Posts: 32
Total number of comments: 19
Last 10 Feedback Posts by MacAdict4Life [ Search for All ]
TiVoDecode Manager 3.0 (Mac OS X)
Does it work with Tivo HD? [alert admin]
Sunday, February 15 2009 @ 05:20 AM PST
Mom's Mail 0.5b (Mac OS X)
This is a really clever idea! [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 1 of 1 users found this helpful
Tuesday, April 01 2008 @ 10:04 AM PDT
BSNES 0.2.9 (Mac OS X)
Considering games that I played properly on SNES9X, like Stunt Race FX, run just fine on BSNES... well I guess cycle exact helps me a bit there, hmm? You use SNES9X until you have a reason to want cycle-exact emulation, and an ability to run it. I had the former for a long time. Now I have the later too, and suddenly I don't even keep SNES9X on my hard drive. It's not that it's a bad emulator, it's that it cannot run every game flawlessly. Your more efficient emulator may run 98% of games fine, but I have all of them, and I want them all to run perfectly. I just don't understand the hostility. It's a free emulator that works perfectly, sacrificing efficiency. There's another free emulator that sacrifices flawless playability for efficiency. Do I rage against SNES9X because it can't play a handful of games, and I have the computer power to handle emulation that can play them all? No. So why do you rage against BSNES over the fact that you lack the computer power to run it? You have your free alternative, and this isn't even a competition. Let it go! [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 2 of 3 users found this helpful
Monday, March 03 2008 @ 11:10 AM PST
BSNES 0.2.9 (Mac OS X)
Considering games that I played properly on SNES9X, like Stunt Race FX, run just fine on BSNES... well I guess cycle exact helps me a bit there, hmm? You use SNES9X until you have a reason to want cycle-exact emulation, and an ability to run it. I had the former for a long time. Now I have the later too, and suddenly I don't even keep SNES9X on my hard drive. It's not that it's a bad emulator, it's that it cannot run every game flawlessly. Your more efficient emulator may run 98% of games fine, but I have all of them, and I want them all to run perfectly. I just don't understand the hostility. It's a free emulator that works perfectly, sacrificing efficiency. There's another free emulator that sacrifices flawless playability for efficiency. Do I rage against SNES9X because it can't play a handful of games, and I have the computer power to handle emulation that can play them all? No. So why do you rage against BSNES over the fact that you lack the computer power to run it? You have your free alternative, and this isn't even a competition. Let it go! [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 1 of 2 users found this helpful
Monday, March 03 2008 @ 11:10 AM PST
TiVoDecode Manager 2.1 (Mac OS X)
Any chance of Leopard compatibility? [alert admin]
Read Comments (3) | More Info
Tuesday, November 06 2007 @ 01:12 AM PST
Sync Entourage-iCal 2 (Tiger) 2.0.8 (Mac OS X)
Will not be needed in a few months
Microsoft will add sync services to Entourage in an update coming out early this year (I think at MacWorld they said by April). After that this overpriced tool that I never got to work right when I tried it will no longer be needed. [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info | 1 of 3 users found this helpful
Friday, February 24 2006 @ 02:58 AM PST
Goldfish Aquarium 0.9.6 (Mac OS X)
Is just too high. I would never pay $15 for a screen saver, let alone $20. $5 strikes me as a better screen saver price point. [alert admin]
Read Comments (1) | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Friday, September 03 2004 @ 01:32 AM PDT
TechTool Pro 4.0.3 (Mac OS X)
There was a time when nearly every download you would find came from the MIT HyperArchive. *shrugs* [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 0 of 1 users found this helpful
Friday, August 27 2004 @ 01:39 PM PDT
LinkLines 1.1.0 (Mac OS 9, Mac OS X)
Way overpriced. [alert admin]
Post a comment | More Info | 4 of 6 users found this helpful
Thursday, August 26 2004 @ 08:46 PM PDT
OmniWeb 5.0rc1 (Mac OS X)
Why pay? The thumbnail tabs alone are worth $30 to me. The work spaces are AMAZING for projects and whatnot. In fact, there are so many features of this browser that you can't find or you can't find as well done anywhere else that I can't list all of them. Type "google cats" in the search bar to google search without using the muse to click to the search tab. Try to add VersionTracker or Google Images to any other browser's search field. Find another browser that lists all links on a page (only iCab and OW do this). Oh, and it's $20 for students. [alert admin]
Tuesday, July 20 2004 @ 03:22 PM PDT
Last 10 Comments by MacAdict4Life [ Search for All ]
Wow, a little high and mighty there. I found his comment VERY helpful. I was not planning to go to your webpage to look this up. I was rather irritated that you did not include this information in the description here on VT. He rectified that omission, you should be thanking him. Also, that attitude? Not exactly engendering my sympathies toward your charity leanings.
Original feedback item : Read More
Sunday, September 06 2009 @ 06:14 PM PDT
Wayyyyy too expensive, considering its limited function 
It became free today. Prior to that, it was free to use to look at your drive (and helped me find major space wastes several times). However once you found something to delete, you had to use the Finder to delete it manually. The "trash" button did not work unless you paid them. This is no longer the case.
Original feedback item : Read More
Wednesday, February 25 2009 @ 09:19 PM PST
Except this update is coming out within a year of the initial release!
Original feedback item : Read More
Wednesday, October 15 2008 @ 09:38 AM PDT
Upgrade Policy (reaction to reaction)
Honestly, it sounds like those who bought 4 in December are getting a good deal. A great price if you're happy with what you have, and still a great price (substantially less than full price) if you want 5. There's always a cutoff day, and anyone on the wrong side of it will always feel slighted.
Original feedback item : Read More
Thursday, February 28 2008 @ 09:59 AM PST
YAH! See it! LOL LOL! It's funny!
Original feedback item : Read More
Tuesday, November 06 2007 @ 11:44 AM PST
Disappointed w/iTunes lack of full sync/backup!
iPhoto is what you use to pull photos off your iPhone (backing them up in the process). iTunes WILL sync your mail accounts, IF you turn it on AND select which accounts you want to sync. Look in the Info tab.
Original feedback item : Read More
Thursday, September 27 2007 @ 01:01 PM PDT
I can legally call my new book store McDonalds, as they are not the same industry. You can call your software the same name as them, as long as it is completely dissimilar in function and no reasonable person would confuse the two.
Original feedback item : Read More
Thursday, May 17 2007 @ 02:03 PM PDT
I mean, serious... you want Universal Binary AND Visual Basic support in one release? You're a selfish jerk! Why if they give you both of those now, there's no reason to give up that visual basic support in the next version! What kind of business model is that??? What do you think this is, NeoOffice?
Original feedback item : Read More
Tuesday, May 08 2007 @ 06:20 PM PDT
Inclusive of Intel chipsets only?
Based on what I've read, you are incorrect. All of the add-on Airport Extreme cards are a standard Airport Extreme card, the same as in the Core Duo Macs. The Core 2 Duo macs use a different airport extreme card. The wireless sniffer KisMAC notes this hardware difference, when they discuss why the level of support currently in KisMAC is different for the new Core 2 Duo Macs then core the Core Duos. Now the backwards…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Tuesday, January 30 2007 @ 02:08 PM PST
Inclusive of Intel chipsets only?
Based on what I've read, you are incorrect. All of the add-on Airport Extreme cards are a standard Airport Extreme card, the same as in the Core Duo Macs. The Core 2 Duo macs use a different airport extreme card. The wireless sniffer KisMAC notes this hardware difference, when they discuss why the level of support currently in KisMAC is different for the new Core 2 Duo Macs then core the Core Duos. Now the backwards…
Original feedback item : Read More(1 words)
Tuesday, January 30 2007 @ 02:00 PM PST
