WHY IS THERE STILL NOT A SNOW LEOPARD SPECIFIC CATEGORY YET? - dgkanter
I suggest, JAS 66, that you're missing the point being made in the original feedback. This isn't about this one specific software, but that VersionTracker hasn't provided for the stipulation of Snow Leopard (v10.6) in their Operating System Requirements section for anything in their database. Some developers had included the applicability of Snow Leopard in their comments in other sections (as is the case here with OnyX where the developer has had to use the Additional Requirements to refute the v10.5 cite in the Operating System Requirements), but--it appears--they can't get that fact (if applicable) to show in the System Requirements section. And pending some explanation by CNET/VersionTracker (e.g., that they've given up changing anything in this Web presentation as they're switching over to the CNET TechTracker app that's in beta), all those of us who use the VersionTracker Web site are left without a clear indication from developers as to whether the Operating System Requirements are correct and complete. (Even their own listing for that CNET TechTracker has to "augment" the Operating System Requirements to include v10.6.)
I agree with the earlier posters that this is a very sad state of affairs.
Existing users, log in. New users, create a free account. Lost password?
WHY IS THERE STILL NOT A SNOW LEOPARD SPECIFIC CATEGORY YET? - dgkanter
I suggest, JAS 66, that you're missing the point being made in the original feedback. This isn't about this one specific software, but that VersionTracker hasn't provided for the stipulation of Snow Leopard (v10.6) in their Operating System Requirements section for anything in their database. Some developers had included the applicability of Snow Leopard in their comments in other sections (as is the case here with OnyX where the developer has had to use the Additional Requirements to refute the v10.5 cite in the Operating System Requirements), but--it appears--they can't get that fact (if applicable) to show in the System Requirements section. And pending some explanation by CNET/VersionTracker (e.g., that they've given up changing anything in this Web presentation as they're switching over to the CNET TechTracker app that's in beta), all those of us who use the VersionTracker Web site are left without a clear indication from developers as to whether the Operating System Requirements are correct and complete. (Even their own listing for that CNET TechTracker has to "augment" the Operating System Requirements to include v10.6.)I agree with the earlier posters that this is a very sad state of affairs.
Reply to This | Parent
Saturday, October 24 2009 @ 11:46 AM PDT