Your first assumption would be incorrect jeffster. Second, as to your "majority of users" comment, we don't really have any way to assess that based on this one comment on this forum. Third, this is the type of report that should be sent to the developer. While you and the original poster sound well intentioned, the notion that a beta (and one based on a .kext at that) isn't ready for "prime time" implies an expectation of no bugs. Does the fact that the user found a bug in this BETA software justify the 1 star rating?
Stick with 2.1.4 -- not ready for prime-time - j.warbler.madman
Your first assumption would be incorrect jeffster. Second, as to your "majority of users" comment, we don't really have any way to assess that based on this one comment on this forum. Third, this is the type of report that should be sent to the developer. While you and the original poster sound well intentioned, the notion that a beta (and one based on a .kext at that) isn't ready for "prime time" implies an expectation of no bugs. Does the fact that the user found a bug in this BETA software justify the 1 star rating?Reply to This | Parent
Monday, September 14 2009 @ 03:51 PM PDT