Existing users, 
How about writing a useful comment.... - SPI...master...
How about writing a useful comment instead of just *censored*ing. Once the update was installed, did the software work as it should or did it crash, bomb, etc...? How about keeping your *censored* mode focused at the company (by maybe writing directly to them) instead of the people reading this site who are trying to determine whether the update is a good thing, or should be avoided.Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 09:20 PM PST
7.7.0.0 working fine with Leopard - frodo5641
not sure what all the fuss is about I have version 7.7.0.0 running on a Quad G5 and on a quad Intel both Machines run Leopard and I have no problem with this version at all.Tuesday, December 25 2007 @ 04:08 PM PST
It's about time! - scifiguy
While I admit that the Dymo software for Mac leaves a little to be desired, and they have had some missteps, many developers did not have final release versions of Leopard until after it was in stores. There was a big uproar about it in the Dev community. I have noticed that a number of larger companies have been late updating drivers and software, probably due to waiting for a retail copy of Leopard. While frustrating, I would rather have software tested on the final release rather than a beta of the OS. You should blame Apple for making it difficult for the developers. I'm still waiting for HP to update their scanner software. =(Reply to This
Friday, December 07 2007 @ 02:52 PM PST