Still requires serial number and 100% CPU use while waiting for it!! - diarbyrag

if you had bothered to check the Freeway knowledgebase before you had a whine you would find there is a very informative list of all the fixes which was on the website at the same time as the update
which I downloaded with no hassel at 5.30pm GMT

http://www.softpress.com/kb/article.php?id=750

and despite a few hiccups I still think that Softpress do a better job than adobe, wacom and many others when it comes to providing info

best wishes

Gary
FW Fan

Reply to This

Monday, July 03 2006 @ 05:18 PM PDT

Your signature says it all, "fans" can't be objective - shane16

Your signature says it all, fans can't be objective.

Reply to This

Monday, July 03 2006 @ 05:27 PM PDT

List of "what's new" would be nice - twicks

Yes, I know I could go to the SP site and try to locate the KB article that describes what's new with this version, but that's pretty counterproductive. Just think about it: We note on VT that there's a new version. We also note that there's no "what's new" info. Hey, we're already at VT, why should we go click on the link to go to the developer's site (which takes for-ever via VTs strange redirects), then go try to locate the KB article, then open it and read it. How many hits does SP take of people looking for the KB article? Why not put that info up on VT and please a few casual and serious users rather than force (and I do mean force) users to tiptoe through the Internet when most developers give you this info on VT. Why does VT even have a "What's New" section for developers anyway?

The program's a great one but I really think it's cavalier and draconian of software houses to not publish thier fixes and improvements right here on VT.

Reply to This

Tuesday, July 04 2006 @ 12:59 AM PDT

List of "what's new" would be nice - twicks

Yes, I know I could go to the SP site and try to locate the KB article that describes what's new with this version, but that's pretty counterproductive. Just think about it: We note on VT that there's a new version. We also note that there's no "what's new" info. Hey, we're already at VT, why should we go click on the link to go to the developer's site (which takes for-ever via VTs strange redirects), then go try to locate the KB article, then open it and read it. How many hits does SP take of people looking for the KB article? Why not put that info up on VT and please a few casual and serious users rather than force (and I do mean force) users to tiptoe through the Internet when most developers give you this info on VT. Why does VT even have a "What's New" section for developers anyway?

The program's a great one but I really think it's cavalier and draconian of software houses to not publish thier fixes and improvements right here on VT.

Reply to This

Tuesday, July 04 2006 @ 12:59 AM PDT

List of "what's new" would be nice - twicks

Yes, I know I could go to the SP site and try to locate the KB article that describes what's new with this version, but that's pretty counterproductive. Just think about it: We note on VT that there's a new version. We also note that there's no "what's new" info. Hey, we're already at VT, why should we go click on the link to go to the developer's site (which takes for-ever via VTs strange redirects), then go try to locate the KB article, then open it and read it. How many hits does SP take of people looking for the KB article? Why not put that info up on VT and please a few casual and serious users rather than force (and I do mean force) users to tiptoe through the Internet when most developers give you this info on VT. Why does VT even have a "What's New" section for developers anyway?

The program's a great one but I really think it's cavalier and draconian of software houses to not publish thier fixes and improvements right here on VT.

Reply to This

Tuesday, July 04 2006 @ 01:00 AM PDT

Apolgies for the triple posting of the "what's new" comment - twicks

For some reason when i hit the "submit" button I got an error so i submitted again. I turned into three, which I did not intend. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. VT won't let you edit or delete comments once submitted.

Reply to This

Tuesday, July 04 2006 @ 01:05 AM PDT