Existing users, 
Horrible engine.. - MAC_1984
I love these freebie users, who have probably never even registered this app, and then they make foolish comments plus demote the rating mainly because it's not free. I wish all Mac software had a fee then we'd rid ourselves of the freeloaders always plugging the freebies because they are too cheap to afford the real thing. I have no issues with LaunchBar's speed and this version is much faster. The "digitol_lobo" is probably running a G3, that he got for free...whiner.Wednesday, May 03 2006 @ 09:28 AM PDT
Horrible engine.. - SpyinNZUS
You do realize that in the configuration you can tell it when you want it to scan stuff, right?Also, is there any way that LB can run without an icon in the dock? Just trying to save a little screen real estate.
Thursday, June 08 2006 @ 11:03 AM PDT
Horrible engine.. - Toadling
My experience has been exactly the opposite! I switched to LaunchBar from Quicksilver because Quicksilver felt less responsive (especially when navigating deep folder hierarchies with the arrow keys), a little bloated (yeah, I know, too many plug-ins), sometimes unstable, and unnecessarily flashy. Quicksilver, with its vast plug-in architecture and community, surely has more features, but sometimes "less is more". LaunchBar lacks some of the whiz-bang stuff but simply feels more intuitive, more efficient, more reliable, slightly faster, and its search algorithm seems more intelligent. I know many people love Quicksilver, and it's great that we have choices and competition, but IMO Quicksilver tries to do too many thing and loses focus from it's primary purpose as a launcher.Reply to This
Saturday, April 29 2006 @ 01:22 PM PDT