Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

3 comments |

A problem with the Skramsoft Software License - D_Man

I don't understand exactly what you are trying to say. The problem on 'software licencesing' is ethical philosophical (in a world without ethics nor any philosophical views about life) possibly a merry exercise for laywers. As indeed we "the users" we are always guilty ... as we have no rights but pay for updates. Software, hardware, internet, media comanies give us a licence while they say if anything goes wrong it is our fault no matter what.

The american legal system opened the international trend that nobody is forcing anyone to use anything, AKA computers, and software. Therefore when we use them is at our own risk.

In reality today everything happens via computers. Not using computers means to live a rather difficult existance, not because of our choice but because others choose for us. We are forced to use computers ethically speaking the rest is legal balbla to protect corporate. is .... American as you the Americans have become lately and unfortunately. Americans, and their asisstants, who accept fabricated lies as a system to 'protect' american corporate interests around the globe.

The no responsibility of hard-soft companies are fabricated lies. No more no less.

So don't worry about the nationality of these people, how much it would cost them to fly from here to there, because it will never ever happen. As we the users have no means to claim anything at all.

If there was some kind of law protecting the users because you of serious damage from wrong coding, lack of serious world-wide software guidlines and so on, then your point about this company where they are and who they are would be somewhat meaningful. But such law so not exsist.

Example: I only have Final Cut Pro, on my original Power Book G4 maximum original Apple RAM and nothing else, not even additional extensions from Apple. When Final Cut Pro dies on me it is because the coding can't be tested as far as it should be tested, nor it can be tested under all circumstances.

This is what i see, especially because software and hardware are in fact a subscription where we have to renew wheter we like it or not ... and this is not ... decent, but decency is an old concept isn't it?

Reply to This

Friday, October 27 2006 @ 11:39 AM PDT


A problem with the Skramsoft Software License - gavinwj

This is actually a quite common practice and probably has more to do with taxes than anything else. An IoM company is relatively cheap to set up and run. The authors of this software are most likely the beneficial owners of the company. In order to retain the tax-exempt status, however, they cannot be directors of the company.

Even the big boys set up operations like this, often in the BVI or the Channel Islands.

Reply to This

Monday, April 30 2007 @ 02:04 PM PDT