Apple Mac OS X ( 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 |10.8 | 10.9 | 11.0 ) - JESUSJERKER

11.0? No, 10.10

It's perfectly valid.

Reply to This

Tuesday, April 12 2005 @ 01:58 PM PDT

Apple Mac OS X ( 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 |10.8 | 10.9 | 11.0 ) - Spicer

All these forth coming OS's... one could spend an awful lot of money by the end the year. I'm guessing of course the new OS's are not updates but new systems... around $130 a pop... yikes!

Reply to This

Tuesday, April 12 2005 @ 02:01 PM PDT

Apple Mac OS X ( 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 |10.8 | 10.9 | 11.0 ) - 153957

eeer..

so remind me, what were 10.1 and 10.0 called...
hmmm Pume(10.1) and Cheetah(10.0)
so.. i dont think they'll be using those again... perhaps lion...?

Reply to This

Tuesday, April 12 2005 @ 02:08 PM PDT

Apple Mac OS X ( 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 |10.8 | 10.9 | 11.0 ) - John Crichton

And you'll still have to pay full price for each new kitty! These cats must be very endangered because owning one sure is expensive! I just can't keep paying $130 a year for bug fixes and feature revamps. Is it too late to get a dog instead?

Reply to This

Tuesday, April 12 2005 @ 02:54 PM PDT

Apple Mac OS X ( 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 |10.8 | 10.9 | 11.0 ) - bhose

....and I heard Microsoft are bringing out SNAIL.

Reply to This

Tuesday, April 12 2005 @ 03:33 PM PDT

Apple Mac OS X ( 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 |10.8 | 10.9 | 11.0 ) - jdtjr01

I agree...I get the point

Reply to This

Tuesday, April 12 2005 @ 10:04 PM PDT

Apple Mac OS X ( 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 |10.8 | 10.9 | 11.0 ) - MikuroSodochi

They've already publically said they're slowing the development cycle after Tiger because they feel their customers don't want to pay a "per year" tax to own a Mac and Tiger will pretty much be a "solidified" release. Don't expect 10.5 to ship anytime in 2006, myself.

Reply to This

Wednesday, April 13 2005 @ 08:11 AM PDT

Apple Mac OS X ( 10.4 | 10.5 | 10.6 | 10.7 |10.8 | 10.9 | 11.0 ) - Jane53

Marketing Hype...? Naah! Thanks for a good laugh. Don't forget, even for users who get free updates, we have to pay!

Reply to This

Wednesday, April 13 2005 @ 09:57 AM PDT