"it works" is wrong, coz work is to be done w/o errors - camner
I, too, use WSX on various OS 10.3.x machines, and it works flawlessly. I've never had a problem with it, and I use it all the time.Thursday, December 09 2004 @ 08:29 AM PST
"it works" is wrong, coz work is to be done w/o errors - Kirianya
I shied away from it after upgrading to OSX10.3, but I returned to it with the WS 3.5 release. Some of the animation may work imperfectly, but all the functions work as advertised.Thursday, December 09 2004 @ 02:46 PM PST
"it works" is wrong, coz work is to be done w/o errors - DavidRavenMoon
I'm running 10.3.8 and it is working here. You must have done something to your system. Why don't you try to reinstall it.Tuesday, February 22 2005 @ 01:05 PM PST
"it works" is wrong, coz work is to be done w/o errors - Bill Dawson
saschxd, what are you smoking?Windowshade works in 10.3 and always has. I have NEVER been without it since it came out. (In fact I have never been without it since OS9, but that was another developer.)
I stay cutting-edge updated on all my software. All 5 of my machines have Windowshade among a dozen other haxies and system patches. I write code for a living and can't afford to have an unstable environment and have no problem at all with this this one. I find it indespensable.
You should look elsewhere for your instablity. Have you supplied the developer with your System Profiler output?
Reply to This
Thursday, December 09 2004 @ 06:21 AM PST