i did rate based on the merits -- it didn't run properly, it was offensive, the FAQ instructed me not to email until reading the manual, but the manual wasn't to be found.. all in all a bad user experience, on the merits
as for the sarcasm about fine type to small too read, another wrong assumption.. requirements state forty-two 1.02 or later..i had forty-two (though my version had no version number, turns out it was 1.0).. requirements say nothing about the previous version of "FTP".. also, i think lots of people will be confused since it's not obvious that "forty-two" means "forty-two which is different from this app though the name is quite similar"
i think to "take ease of use to a new level" this app could use a vastly improved initial configuration process
"the merits" - garbanzito-real
thanks for taking my suggestions seriouslyi did rate based on the merits -- it didn't run properly, it was offensive, the FAQ instructed me not to email until reading the manual, but the manual wasn't to be found.. all in all a bad user experience, on the merits
as for the sarcasm about fine type to small too read, another wrong assumption.. requirements state forty-two 1.02 or later..i had forty-two (though my version had no version number, turns out it was 1.0).. requirements say nothing about the previous version of "FTP".. also, i think lots of people will be confused since it's not obvious that "forty-two" means "forty-two which is different from this app though the name is quite similar"
i think to "take ease of use to a new level" this app could use a vastly improved initial configuration process
Reply to This
Friday, July 18 2003 @ 12:37 AM PDT