Well, I just can't agree - ncianca

I'm not sure what kind's of problems you have been having, but I've had some problems with NT when I had installed Unsanity's Silk 3 beta earlier this week. The solution was to add NT (along with a few other cocoa apps) to the don't load list of Silk. I use NT every day and find that the latest release is the best yet.

You mention DevonThink, but I don't see NT and DevonThink as being the same class. They are actually complementary to each other. NT is very good for authoring, managing and annotating complexity in information that is related to a subject. I happen to also use DevonThink as a means of storing assorted images, pdfs, etc. which sometimes ends up in an NT notebook. Is there some overlap, sure, but NT is really not a Scrapbook manager like DevonThink is and DevonThink isn't a digital notebook like NT is. YMMV.

Reply to This

Saturday, June 21 2003 @ 12:06 PM PDT

Well, I just can't agree - CWturner

Based on my work with 1.5.1 I would agree with this objection to the original reviewer. NoteTaker is not slow on either my Pismo or DP 800. I haven't had to readjust settings (what does this refer to?) and the new additions to the program have enhanced it so much. I keep separate notebooks for lots of subjects as well as a standard, always running "keep notes, to dos" for daily work. They have improved the documentation and on their web site there are now videos of how to set up and do things, with more to come. The ability to take web page notes of text, graphics, links and so forth through the Services menu has allowed me to totally replace my Sticky Brain that I used for so long. Contextual menus also work great in my experience in Note Taker.

I also agree that DT is really slightly different in purpose, though I understand many use it in conjunction with NoteTaker. I would give NT five stars myself.

Reply to This

Saturday, June 21 2003 @ 12:31 PM PDT