huh? - yutopia7

why not avi? because you can't play them? use mplayer or vlc to play them. If your computer's slow, use divx doctor.

Reply to This

Friday, June 20 2003 @ 04:10 PM PDT

huh? - yutopia7

why not avi? because you can't play them? use mplayer or vlc to play them. If your computer's slow, use divx doctor.

Reply to This

Friday, June 20 2003 @ 04:10 PM PDT

huh? - yutopia7

why not avi? because you can't play them? use mplayer or vlc to play them. If your computer's slow, use divx doctor.

Reply to This

Friday, June 20 2003 @ 04:10 PM PDT

*Gag* *Sputter* *Choke* - OpenGL128

AVI is just a container file, divx has nothing to do with it

Reply to This

Friday, June 20 2003 @ 04:45 PM PDT

*Gag* *Sputter* *Choke* - Quobobo

Riiight.. because we all want to use a proprietary format like .mov

Reply to This

Friday, June 20 2003 @ 09:20 PM PDT

*Gag* *Sputter* *Choke* - panZ

AVI and Mov are just wrappers for movies, they have little to do with the movie content and codec. You can have a DIVX avi or mov, motion jpeg avi or mov, cinepak, etc... there is very little difference. Container files used to store information like bitrate and how the audio and video were multiplexed but in with modern codecs, they rarely even do that. Saying AVI is bad is like saying the soup in my ziplock bag is worse than the exact same soup in your tuporware when the reality is, you just don't know how to open my ziplock bag.

Reply to This

Saturday, June 21 2003 @ 12:42 PM PDT

*Gag* *Sputter* *Choke* - DebianDog

The REAL Lukifer would be impressed with your stupidity!

Reply to This

Sunday, June 22 2003 @ 08:10 PM PDT