Great Candidate for PerversionTracker ... - WCityMike
Your explanation seems highly doubtful, although as I have no programming experience, I can't really speak to anything but the general feeling that it's not valid. As for it looking like crap because the developers believe it has to have the ability to run on a chip set (the 68xxx) that was superceded a very, very long time ago, and on an operating system version (7.0) which is over 13 years old ... well, suffice it to say that few end users are going to agree with that decision. And, again, the application supposes to details error codes. The "free service" isn't what's being judged here on VT: it's the application. And the application is crap -- and, as others have pointed out, has been superceded by an Apple-provided file on our own computers.
Great Candidate for PerversionTracker ... - WCityMike
Your explanation seems highly doubtful, although as I have no programming experience, I can't really speak to anything but the general feeling that it's not valid. As for it looking like crap because the developers believe it has to have the ability to run on a chip set (the 68xxx) that was superceded a very, very long time ago, and on an operating system version (7.0) which is over 13 years old ... well, suffice it to say that few end users are going to agree with that decision. And, again, the application supposes to details error codes. The "free service" isn't what's being judged here on VT: it's the application. And the application is crap -- and, as others have pointed out, has been superceded by an Apple-provided file on our own computers.Reply to This | Parent
Monday, August 11 2003 @ 10:17 AM PDT