zunipus: Version 1 and 2 are covered here: http://www.chromefans.org/chrome-tutorial/google-chrome-version-history.htm There is also a google-run blog that shows previous versions of chrome complete with change-logs. Version 3 is currently being used for the betas on Microsoft systems, while version 4 has been reserved for the current efforts on OSX, linux and future Microsoft releases. Evil? A corporate scam? How about buying an operating system's technologies and re-branding them as your own? And even if google was a marketing moron (which they aren't: they've built their company based on unique marketing methods- much like mac), how does that equal a contempt of customers? Don't make the internet any more stupid; research your claims. Gerks: Of that $1.42B, how much did you contribute? Judging on your expressed contempt for non-mac software, my guess is none. So stuff it. If you did contribute cash, I would think that you would want them to release an application that is stable and works. If you don't know what I'm getting at, try this: what are you doing downloading developer software? If you were a software developer, you would likely understand that it takes time to port any software, even when all of a companies resources are devoted to the task, which they aren't. Have you heard of the linux port? How about Chrome OS? Check out the linux community's responses to their current port of chrome; they generally seem happy to have a choice in internet browsers, and happier still that when the final release comes it won't be broken due to a lack of preparation.