Alberto, that is totally unnecessary. No one was wrong - save perhaps the Safari development crew. What happened was the result of a four part bug.
1. Since OS X 10.3.6 Safari's increased its timeout from one minute to ONE YEAR.
2. Users upgrading from Tiger to Leopard experienced corruption of the keychain.
3. When Safari couldn't read the keychain it would incorrectly think it had not reached the site - result: keep hammering away with thousands of hits in a minute or two.
4. Another bug caused Safari to loop out of control after a few minutes and crash.
It's all documented here and it occurs on upgrades and when accessing site URLs that require authentication.
http://rixstep.com/2/4/20080516,00.shtml
As far as we know this has not been fixed by Apple. On the other hand the cure is easy: simply remove the corresponding entries in the keychain and log in again, this time submitting username and password.
The 'one year timeout' does remain what we know in Safari.
This was about half a year ago; it was a panicky time for all. If you don't have our tools then run netstat in a loop when using Safari in this fashion; if you see a sudden blizzard of connections then quit Safari and take the above steps.
Cheers.
Xfile Test Drive
ACP file management utilities including Xfile.
Version: 2.1.0.2
Re:
Feedback Type: Commentary
Contributed by: rixstep Thursday, October 16 2008 @ 07:47 PM PDT
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Over One Year
Recommend Product: YES
Comments
Re: - rixstep
Yes, potentially lots of people. Anyone who upgraded to Leopard instead of doing a clean install who had reason to interface with Apache web servers in this way was a possible victim. 'Twas an ugly bug Apple never recognised. [Nothing new there. ;)] We had some engineer friends from down under do the tests and isolate it. For the record: setting a page timeout of one whole year as they did with Safari - you insert the word you feel most appropriate. It's certainly not professional.Wednesday, April 29 2009 @ 12:39 AM PDT
Re: - alberto2602
thanksalberto
ps: it was necessary
just a question: did anyone suffer these bug?
Reply to This
Friday, October 17 2008 @ 12:26 PM PDT