Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Business / Productivity  |  Calendars / Organizers  |  BusySync  |  Probably unnecessary

BusySync

BusySync

iCal calendar sharing & Google Calendar sync

Version:  2.1.8

   [ Views: 449 ]

Probably unnecessary

Feedback Type:  Commentary

Contributed by: Westside guy Saturday, August 23 2008 @ 08:57 PM PDT

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Less than a month

Now that Google Calendar supports CalDAV - a calendar sharing protocol that iCal supports out of the box - these sorts of programs are probably unnecessary for most people. You can just use iCal to directly access your Google calendar, including adding, modifying, and deleting events.

Take a look at Google's how-to regarding setting up iCal for use with Google Calendar.

  

2 of 4 users found this helpful.

Rate this Commentary

Was this Commentary helpful? Yes | No

Comments

2 comments |

Probably unnecessary - afterhours

It does a lot more than just feed Google your data. Syncing between Macs on a LAN is a powerful management tool in our business model. Knowing where staff are, client contacts occur, notifications (which, in our experience, work flawlessly), and organizing our various workloads really have become essential. This product replaced Now Up To Date, doesn't require a server, and is simple to set up and configure.

We don't use Google. We don't want our data exposed to Google. I suppose if we were to need an 'anywhere' calendar without sufficient privacy or security concerns, Google would be one of the considerations. But for a simple peer-to-peer (to peer x3 more, as we have 5 systems that need to be sync'd), this product consumes very little bandwidth and has functioned exceptionally well with the 10 calendars we run.

YMMV.

Reply to This

Monday, October 20 2008 @ 08:24 AM PDT


Probably unnecessary - deekay77

I agree that is probably unnecessary for the average calendar user. I tried it for the trial period and it did work, although I kept getting repeated messages from Apple's sync control about conflicts and data merge needs.

I might have taken the time to get to know it better, but at $25 a pop PER COMPUTER it very quickly looses its attractiveness to the home user with a couple desktops and laptops. Careful use of Google make much more economic sense.

Reply to This

Thursday, November 13 2008 @ 02:09 PM PST