$300 dollars. That's more than two complete OSX installs and it's just too much money for a page layout application upgrade. I mean really!
Still, kinda irrationally wanting to see if the latest version is actually any better, I tried their online upgrade process. Lo and behold their web store won't accept my login information, declaring that my e-mail address is "not valid". Not valid! Ive been a QXP user since the late 80s, I've got the most recent version prior to 8, I haven't changed my e-mail address, and all of my info was current on their site the last time I logged on.
Other than some glitzy new online marketing graphics, just about everything this company does now is flawed. A once great company of the 80's and early 90's has turned into mush since the advent of X, primarily due to a corporate culture that puts end-user interests last and treats us with disdain. $300 dollars just for an upgrade! Maybe they are factoring the escalating cost of gas into their upgrade/download pricing.
Please see my original comments about when and where Quark went wrong and how they continue to goof up — about six posts down from here.
QuarkXPress
Page layout and design for print and web.
Version: 8.12
Typical
Feedback Type: Review
Contributed by: Clams McShrew Sunday, August 03 2008 @ 10:20 PM PDT
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Over One Year
Recommend Product: NO
Overall Rating:
Ease of Use:
Support:
Features:
Quality / Stability:
Price:
Comments
Reply to Vic Lennard - Clams McShrew
And on what grounds are you giving them four stars? Because for $300 they added several new features that should have been there years ago?Monday, August 04 2008 @ 08:37 PM PDT
Typical - caviafrits
Vic,There is *no* reason to think that Xpress made some progress since Xpress 4. It's the same thing in a new package.
They lost it....
Indesign is far, far, far better in everything than Xpress.
Tuesday, August 19 2008 @ 03:44 PM PDT
Typical - Vic Lennard
So on what grounds are you giving it one star? Because you had a problem with the upgrade procedure??Reply to This
Monday, August 04 2008 @ 05:16 AM PDT