Screenmates1, from what you've written it seems that you most likely have never used either version of the program, and if you have, and you got it to work properly, you would have had to been visiting the ripdifferent.com forum on a regular basis, and if you were doing that, you'd know enough to know that the developer doesn't need to come here to try and hawk his product at all. None of the comments on here are from the developer at all. 2.6.6 will not work on many of the new titles. I know from my own experience. If the opposite were true, no one would be bending over backwards trying to get the newest version.

The following statement is just not true at all.

"I noticed that v2.6 displays different space requirements for full disk extraction (more) and main feature extraction (less) while v3 displays the same disk space as needed for both modes." I don't know what program your using, but i think your in a fog, and i think your here just to rant, and are basically just lying to get attention, god knows why.

Sure, fairmount can mount any disk, and replace it with a decrypted disk image, but, go ahead and see how long it takes to copy that disk image to your hard drive, since its decrypting on the fly, it takes AGES. And NO, it doesnt work on alot of new titles either. Once again, it fairmount were that effective, and fast, no one would be bothering with MTR at all.

Go to ripdifferent.com and see how many registered users there are. All those people are wrong? Do you honestly think all of them havent tried the fairmount route, or havent tried to get 2.6.6 to work on newer titles? Of course they have, thats why they are using the newest version. I don't know what your agenda is, but you really dont know WHAT your talking about.
And NO, im not the developer.