Version:
At Least 10X slower on PPC G4 than version 2.11
Feedback Type: Commentary
Contributed by: libertyforall1776 Wednesday, April 30 2008 @ 03:41 PM PDT
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Less than a month
Recommend Product: NO
This is at Least 10X slower on PPC G4 than version 2.11 -- nice "upgrade"... :-(
Comments
At Least 10X slower on PPC G4 than version 2.11 - chris540
Why would someone expect an upgrade to run faster?Perhaps because the developer had been talking about how the new version would use OpenGL for faster smoother animation?
I have considered the feature set, and apart from the new UI and new plottable items, there don't appear to be that many new features. The one feature I was looking forward too - smoother animation isn't there. It even grinds on this 2Gig core 2 duo. Perhaps Adobe will optimize AIR more in the future, but in the meantime I don't see a very compelling reason to upgrade from 2 to 3.
Thursday, May 01 2008 @ 06:48 AM PDT
At Least 10X slower on PPC G4 than version 2.11 - libertyforall1776
AIR runs HORRIBLY slow on the PPC G4 -- hence all AIR apps are extremely pokey. AIR is a terrible choice for this app, it's a big speed hit.Most developers, including M$, still don't get it...
Thursday, May 01 2008 @ 11:49 AM PDT
At Least 10X slower on PPC G4 than version 2.11 - Paolo Cordone
> apart from the new UI and new plottable items, there don't> appear to be that many new features
Interesting, I see lots of new capabilities: display and forecast of rainfall, temperature, wind speed/direction/, pressure, ozone, radar precititation, customizable elements, such as the ISS plots, aurora activity, etc. To me (and I guess to many others), these are "that many features".
Paolo
Thursday, May 01 2008 @ 01:53 PM PDT
At Least 10X slower on PPC G4 than version 2.11 - Paolo Cordone
Why do you expect an upgrade to run necessarily faster than a previous version? You have to consider feature set, development environment, etc., in order to do a proper comparison.This is a completely new beast from version 2.
Paolo
Reply to This
Thursday, May 01 2008 @ 02:43 AM PDT