Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Audio / Video  |  Management  |  Movie Collector  |  So how does this expensive app compare to others?

Movie Collector

Movie Collector

Dvd database software: catalog your movies.

Version:  3.1.2

   [ Views: 484 ]

So how does this expensive app compare to others?

Feedback Type:  Commentary

Contributed by: tod3 Saturday, January 26 2008 @ 12:00 AM PST

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Have Not Tried

Recommend Product: NO

I've been using the "pedia" library managers for some time now and I can't find fault with them

What advantages does the "collectorz" series have over the pedias that warrant more than double the pice ($39.95 vs. $18.00)?

Somebody here needs to *sell* us on the advantages of the collectorz over the pedias. No one will pay double for essentially the same app, especially one that requires an "installer" of all things. This isn't Adobe Photoshop after all. It appears that the developer doesn't know a thing about the Mac market or community...   

1 of 1 users found this helpful.

Rate this Commentary

Was this Commentary helpful? Yes | No

Comments

1 comments |

So how does this expensive app compare to others? - mailing.lists.2005

I own DVDCache, DVDpedia and MovieCollector. Every time I wipe the main partition and reload programmes, I give all 3 a new try and each time I end up going back to DVDpedia. I don't scan codes so that feature is useless to me. I don't need or want as much catalogue information as MovieCollector gives me so many features are useless to me. Each of the 3 apps have their weaknesses but DVDpedia, at half the price, seems to be the most compatible for my needs. I had originally bought MovieCollector because it was billed as being compatible PC-Mac which it is... sort of. You can import a PC database into Mac but not the other way around, which made that feature useless for sharing databases with PC friends. I like that you can have separate Collector collections unlike pedia which keeps all info in one gigantic database, but multiple windows don't stay open so there's no drag&drop among collections so there's a lot of import/export unnecessarily. My +4000 titles in pedia's one database have slowed it to a crawl, but pedia imports the information from iMDb and amazon far faster and with less human-interaction than MovieCollector. So, in the scheme of things, I regret paying for Collector. YMMV depending on how large your collection becomes and how often you actually modify the database. I input daily, multiple times, while using other online applications.

Reply to This

Wednesday, April 30 2008 @ 06:48 AM PDT