Dymo was not prepared for the release of Leopard. They had ample opportunity to be a member of the Apple Developer's program and have this update ready when Leopard came out. But no, they opted to save the money and it took them two months to release an update. There is no excuse for that and we will never purchase another Dymo product.
As for the update, it took two installs before it worked. Just like the previous version, it is buggy and a bad effort from a company which has the resources to put out better products. I guarantee you if it was a Windows version it would be a different story. They have no respect for their Macintosh customers.
DYMO LabelWriter
For LabelWriter 300, 400, 450 series.
Version: 8.2
It's about time!
Feedback Type: Review
Contributed by: Not important Friday, December 07 2007 @ 10:12 AM PST
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Less than a month
Recommend Product: NO
Overall Rating:
Ease of Use:
Support:
Features:
Quality / Stability:
Price:
Comments
How about writing a useful comment.... - SPI...master...
How about writing a useful comment instead of just *censored*ing. Once the update was installed, did the software work as it should or did it crash, bomb, etc...? How about keeping your *censored* mode focused at the company (by maybe writing directly to them) instead of the people reading this site who are trying to determine whether the update is a good thing, or should be avoided.Saturday, December 08 2007 @ 09:20 PM PST
7.7.0.0 working fine with Leopard - frodo5641
not sure what all the fuss is about I have version 7.7.0.0 running on a Quad G5 and on a quad Intel both Machines run Leopard and I have no problem with this version at all.Tuesday, December 25 2007 @ 04:08 PM PST
It's about time! - scifiguy
While I admit that the Dymo software for Mac leaves a little to be desired, and they have had some missteps, many developers did not have final release versions of Leopard until after it was in stores. There was a big uproar about it in the Dev community. I have noticed that a number of larger companies have been late updating drivers and software, probably due to waiting for a retail copy of Leopard. While frustrating, I would rather have software tested on the final release rather than a beta of the OS. You should blame Apple for making it difficult for the developers. I'm still waiting for HP to update their scanner software. =(Reply to This
Friday, December 07 2007 @ 02:52 PM PST