Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Design / Graphics  |  CAD / Technical  |  Live Interior 3D Standard  |  Gorgeous renderings

Live Interior 3D Standard

Live Interior 3D Standard

Home and office interior design software.

Version:  2.2.1

   [ Views: 752 ]

Gorgeous renderings

Feedback Type:  Review

Contributed by: jdavidsn Monday, July 30 2007 @ 11:25 AM PDT

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: 6-12 months

Recommend Product: YES

I bought and used a competitor, Punch Home Design Studio for a while. Punch is a semi-modernized application with a crusty old core ported from Windows.

I found Live Interior 3D to be much more satisfying... faster to render 3D views with lighting, walkthroughs in 3D. And the shaded renderings are stunning: everyone including our architects ask us what program we use.

The price is miniscule relative to the cost of a home renovation project. We found that it truly helped us to feel what the space would be like and to make dozens of "what if" changes.

It is great being able to download 3D models from Google (http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehouse/). We were able to find many models and add them to our design.

There are bugs, sluggishness and awkward UIs. But the program is in active development with frequent updates and they seem to listen to customers. So hopefully they will continue to work on stability, performance and UI efficiency.   
Overall Rating:

Ease of Use:

Support:

Features:

Quality / Stability:

Price:

5 of 5 users found this helpful.

Rate this Review

Was this Review helpful? Yes | No

Comments

1 comments |

Gorgeous renderings - Gael1967

Comparing Live Interiors to Home Design is like comparing Photoshop to Maya. They are designed to do completely different things. For interior design, yes Live is great and I'd use it hands down. But if you're more into designing an entire home, yard... then it would be Home Design. Basing the value of these programs solely on rendering is unfair and inaccurate.

Reply to This

Wednesday, April 02 2008 @ 12:35 PM PDT