Existing users, 
First clue 01001011 doesn't know what he is talking about. He posts the same reply three times to my post (yes I double posted but that is because vt wasn't responding) then he posts the same drivel in the main commentary section. Pardon me but starting off a post with "you are an idiot" doesn't make you credible.
Next clue, equirectangular panoramas are 360x180 spherical mappings and it is PTGui that does equirectangular not CS3. CS3 does cylindrical, perspective and shift. Until PTGui, a ripoff of Helmut Dersch's Panotools code, does least cost blending, CS3 wins for anything but 360 degree panoramas.
Learn to learn from different opinions my friend.
PTGui
Stitch any number of photos into panoramic image.
Version: 8.3.3
yup 01001011 doesn't know what he is talking about
Feedback Type: Commentary
Contributed by: David N. Tuesday, June 19 2007 @ 10:40 AM PDT
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Over One Year
Comments
yup 01001011 doesn't know what he is talking about - O1OO1O11
jeez you're *censored*ing dumb.Friday, June 29 2007 @ 12:40 AM PDT
Why PTGui? - awaMan
How does PTGui compare to PTMac, other than costing more (even more now with the wimpy USD) and offering full fisheye support (PTMac is officially limited to 160 degees' field-of-view, although there is unofficial support for full fisheye shots)?Though a novice, I use a fisheye and 16-bit images in PTMac and get (I think) good output, although PTMac's workflow is not wholly 16-bit-friendly. PTMac upgrades have been steady, usually (always? I can't recall) free, and support is usually excellent. Together with CubicConnector and CubicConverter as well, I can do almost anything I want with QTVR interactive panoramas.
I'm not attacking PTGui, just looking for others' opinions and advice.
Thursday, October 04 2007 @ 07:36 AM PDT
yup 01001011 doesn't know what he is talking about - O1OO1O11
jeez you're *censored*ing dumb.Reply to This
Friday, June 29 2007 @ 12:40 AM PDT