Existing users, 
Same Title, and same reasons, I gave for my feedback on 9.03 are valid for 9.05 (and while not submitted, were also for 9.04. As you'll see from the list of changes, some are to squash bugs, but others are in response to specific requests by users.
The primary reason for this Feedback is that the VersionTracker statistics fail to recognize that a single Feedback has provided a rating and continues to report the software as "This Version: Not Rated". I'm hoping that by providing a second rating this version of Reunion will now include imacmike's rating.
Reunion
Genealogy and charting software.
Version: 9.0b
Quick Response to Enhance/Fix Major Upgrade to Great Program
Feedback Type: Review
Contributed by: dgkanter Saturday, June 16 2007 @ 11:03 AM PDT
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Over One Year
Recommend Product: YES
Overall Rating:
Ease of Use:
Support:
Features:
Quality / Stability:
Price:
Comments
Do you work for the publisher? - afterhours
I concur... stop spamming VT. This package is deserving of at least 4.5 stars, but good grief -- one rating per version (not point update) is sufficient.Thursday, July 05 2007 @ 01:10 PM PDT
Do you work for the publisher? - dgkanter
IMHO, it’s not spamming to re-review a product when a publisher produces dot versions that enhance the product as substantially as Leister Productions always does with their dot versions. (Too many others provide marginal enhancements and require a paid upgrade.)Thursday, November 15 2007 @ 11:51 AM PST
Quick Response to Enhance/Fix Major Upgrade to Great Program - macmacperson
I would agree that with significant additions/changes to an application a new review would not be out of line. Reunion seems to have significant change here. It also bothers me when people are accused of working for the developer when they merely provide their honest feedback in support of whichever application they really like. I would have trouble believing the Reunion people would be stacking the deck at VT. Of course, I've been wrong before, but I really doubt that. I have also been accused of working for this or that developer when posting positive reviews or postings in defense of some application. Not good.Thursday, November 15 2007 @ 02:35 PM PST
Do you work for the publisher? - anothersphere
Because you have posted a 100% rating soooo many times now you are actually making the product look BAD. You can comment without rating it 100 times!Reply to This
Wednesday, June 27 2007 @ 04:45 AM PDT