Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Business / Productivity  |  Database  |  iGTD  |  Deleting calendars?

iGTD

iGTD

Powerful GTD-like organizer.

Version:  1.4.5.6

   [ Views: 875 ]

Deleting calendars?

Feedback Type:  Commentary

Contributed by: ylon Friday, April 20 2007 @ 01:25 PM PDT

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Have Not Tried

Recommend Product: NO

I would really like to like and try this application, however this app is worrisome in that it has potential to cause so much damage. Even with backups this is really not acceptable. Could the developer please give us some comfort here regarding this and advise us as to how they are currently dealing with this so as to guarantee that this will not happen again? Perhaps they have a selfbackup and restore regiment in place that will be applied upon detecting data incongruencies/corruption?   

2 of 5 users found this helpful.

Rate this Commentary

Was this Commentary helpful? Yes | No

Comments

2 comments |

Agree -- iGTD 1.3.5 ate another set of Calendars! - SGoodheart

I really agree with you. I love how this program works, and I think it has the potential to be the the best GTD front end for iCal out there, but today, the latest version -- 1.3.5 -- devoured all the sub-Calendars under my Calendar Groups again. Since I had no confidence this wouldn't happen as it did with an earlier version, I did a iCal backup and *then* ran the program. Oddly, when the program fired up, iGTD did not have all the Contexts from iCAl that it had yesterday, just the Inbox. So, before I did a synchronize, I did the backup, and sure enough, when I did the synchronize, iGTD deleted almost all of the events from iCal. This is a nasty, fatal error, and it really needs to get fixed before adding a single new feature. I really want to use this program, but I can't trust it right now.

Reply to This

Monday, April 30 2007 @ 08:55 PM PDT


Deleting calendars? - ylon

Can't we see a resolution of this issue? I don't understand why all users wouldn't be pestering developer ad naseum until this issue is repaired and we have a fail-proof solution as well as integrated backup in place. It just befuddles me. It also bothers me that everyone here doesn't see this as a real problem.

Reply to This

Thursday, May 03 2007 @ 03:30 PM PDT