Existing users, 
If we USE a multichat, we need an evolution of Fire, far ahead in functionality.
If we look at a decorative toy for kids (like the ridiculous microshit messenger), then Ok, this is.. 'nice'.
Too long to list all the useful functionality of Fire that here are even no stretched.
The multichat is near to die and many people gave up while the property programs don't supports our OS X ... a ruin...
Adium
Multi-protocol instant messaging client.
Version: 1.3.2
Far behind Fire and far more conceited
Feedback Type: Review
Contributed by: GianMarco Tavazzani Monday, January 01 2007 @ 02:48 PM PST
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Over One Year
Recommend Product: NO
Overall Rating:
Ease of Use:
Features:
Quality / Stability:
Price:
Comments
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - sprynmr
Um...Is this the developer for Fire?
Cause what a ridiculous comment. I've tried Fire and Adium. Fire doesn't even compare.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 03:46 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - sprynmr
Um...Is this the developer for Fire?
Cause what a ridiculous comment. I've tried Fire and Adium. Fire doesn't even compare.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 03:48 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - sprynmr
Um...Is this the developer for Fire?
Cause what a ridiculous comment. I've tried Fire and Adium. Fire doesn't even compare.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 03:51 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - ktappe--2008
Fire does not handle Lotus Sametime protocol, Adium does. Game over, Fire loses. We use Sametime at work and therefore Adium, as the best Sametime client we've found for MacOS X, is our one and only chat client. If any of you Fire fans want to go add Sametime support (unlikely, as Fire does not seem to have been updated for 1 whole year), be my guest. Until you do, Adium is the best IM client for Mac.Friday, February 02 2007 @ 03:54 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 05:45 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 05:49 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 05:53 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 05:57 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 06:01 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 06:05 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 06:09 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 06:14 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 06:18 PM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - kzin
That's kinda funny. I switched away from Fire, to AdiumX, because Fire was unstable, had poor support for the protocols it carries, and only had one protocol that Adium didn't: IRC. And, frankly, IRC wasn't worth the hastle.<br>
Fire's Jabber support was terrible. It actually crashed more than once. That was the breaking point for me. Adium supported all of the protocols I use (AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Jabber), and did so with stability and grace. Fire was a ball of bugs.
Friday, February 02 2007 @ 06:21 PM PST
we call it Fireball 'cause it crashes so much - Tungsten2K
=P-=dave
Monday, February 05 2007 @ 04:47 AM PST
Far behind Fire and far more conceited - David_Clark_625
I'm afraid I can hardly follow your comment. What exactly are you complaining about, other than apparently multiprotocol messengers in general are about to die? (Actually, they seem to be becoming even more popular, as most people use multiple services.) Any actual constructive comments would be helpful, but vague complaints are not useful.Reply to This
Thursday, January 04 2007 @ 12:15 PM PST