Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  System / Utilities  |  Disk / File Managers / Uninstallers  |  Default Folder X  |  a shadow of its former self

Default Folder X

Default Folder X

Enhance open/save dialogs with improved navigation & preview, spotlight tagging.

Version:  4.3.3

   [ Views: 1089 ]

a shadow of its former self

Feedback Type:  Review

Contributed by: brindsley quives Thursday, December 21 2006 @ 02:31 AM PST

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Less than a month

Recommend Product: NO

DF was indispensible back in the pre-OSX days and was one of the first things i'd install on any new system. the OSX version however is a pale shadow of its former self.

where classic DF did actually "enhance" open/save dialogues by building new features directly into the dialogue, OSX DF instead attaches a 'fischer price'-like icon bar to the side of open/save dialogues, which looks completely out of place and, like an errant child, is forever prone to becoming separated from its parent - move a dialogue across the screen and DF folder stays where it is for a while, before looking round in panic and belatedly rushing across the screen to into the waiting arms of "mother".

it's all horribly clunky and [for me anyway] makes DF unusable on OSX. shame! - because as i mentioned above, this was one of the greats, back in the classic days.

as a slightly off-topic parting shot; all the functionality DF offers should be built into the OS in the first place, but waiting for apple to FTFF is, as we all know, another futile exercise!

  
Overall Rating:

Ease of Use:

Support:

Features:

Quality / Stability:

Price:

3 of 20 users found this helpful.

Rate this Review

Was this Review helpful? Yes | No

Comments

6 comments |

a shadow of its former self - Vinita Boy

Obviously, you've never developed a piece of software for OS X, brindsley, and because of that vacuum in your professional experience, most of us will take your criticism with the proverbial grain of salt. I've been using the Mac since the time of the "Fat Mac" and have used Default Folder since its inception in the good ol' "Classic" days. Its OS X iteration is just as good as it has always been, so do take a laxative and get some rest, OK? Just remember, prunes are good for you!

Reply to This

Friday, December 29 2006 @ 09:33 AM PST


Say What? - MAC_1984

Wow! Someone who rates a "beta" this low? First off, DF is indispensable if you use your Mac for any length of time because it saves major time. I too did not care for how it appends itself toe the side of the save dialog box, but now I don't even give it a thought as DF is an indispensable productivity with a Mac Developer who has been with us for a long, long time, and adds benefit to the Mac community.

Reply to This

Friday, December 29 2006 @ 09:57 AM PST


a shadow of its former self - brindsley quives

>>Obviously, you've never developed a piece of software for OS X, brindsley, and because of that vacuum in your professional experience, most of us will take your criticism with the proverbial grain of salt...

Reply to This

Saturday, December 30 2006 @ 06:09 AM PST


a shadow of its former self - brindsley quives

ah! - great stuff versiontracker! - make me write f***kin' HTML by hand to post a sodding comment. then, cut the bloody thing off after one paragraph! i give up!

Reply to This

Saturday, December 30 2006 @ 06:11 AM PST


a shadow of its former self - plaintiger

i think everybody's a bit overpassionate here. in fact, there's merit to brindsley's complaint about DF lagging behind when a dialog is moved; that can be slightly disconcerting/annoying (though as far as i know, being disconcerting/annoying is its worst offense). and if he preferred the way DF looked/worked under OS 9, well, he's entitled to his opinion, and - because it is an opinion - the complaint is valid. i know from my own experience, though, that when i have a reaction like that to change in the behavior/appearance of a piece of software, it's usually simple resistance to change on my part - an unwillingness to relinquish the old, familiar, comfortable way of doing things and that, if i give the new model a chance, turns out as often as not to be completely unfounded.

brindsley's post is unlikely to deter anyone new to DF from trying it. he only makes two specific complaints; one of them is comparative, with the pre-X OS as the benchmark, and few people care about the pre-X OS anymore (and anyone new to DF has probably not been using the Mac long enough to have ever seen the pre-X OS anyway), and the other complaint is cosmetic - hardlly a deal-breaker. i don't think his review is going to exile Default Folder to the bargain bins any time soon.

Default Folder may be, in his opinion, "a shadow of its former self"...but its former self is, for most people, irrelevant, and however it may compare to older versions, the current incarnation of Default Folder remains an indispensable piece of software. so i don't see the need for bridsley nor his detractors to get so worked up. just use Default Folder (or don't, as you see fit) and be happy.

Reply to This

Thursday, January 18 2007 @ 11:12 AM PST


a shadow of its former self - brindsley quives

i didn't think i was getting particularly "worked up". i just happened to mention that i thought this app had deteriorated from its previous incarnation under 'classic'

-

according to the other posters [who did seem to get worked up!], this marked me out as everything from a luddite longing for a return to 'classic' [which i'm not] to a congenital idiot [which i'm not] to someone pushing some kind of hidden agenda to undermine DF and possibly western civilisation [which i'm not either!]

-

i think your [plaintiger] comment about resistance to change is a bit wide of the mark in this instance. i'm firmly of the opinion that the reason DF in its present incarnation presents a toolbar [more or less!] attached to the side of the open/save dialogues is because, unlike with 'classic' the developer was unable to actually alter the structure of the dialogues themselves under OSX. i can't for a minute believe the current implementation was done by preference. therefore, this is not a case of resistance to change, just a lament for the deterioration of a formerly excellent piece of software

-

it would be interesting to hear from the developer on this. i don't suppose s/he would be too keen to admit that the the latest version of DF was anything but the greatest thing since sliced bread, but i'd be interested to know if my hunch is correct and the toolbar only came about because the OSX open/save dialogues are not as 'hackable' as they once were.

Reply to This

Friday, January 26 2007 @ 05:56 PM PST