Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Business / Productivity  |  Planning / Project Management  |  OmniOutliner Pro  |  STILL no Cloning - UGH

OmniOutliner Pro

OmniOutliner Pro

Outline & organize thoughts, tasks, projects...

Version:  3.9.3

   [ Views: 1427 ]

STILL no Cloning - UGH

Feedback Type:  Review

Contributed by: cogden Thursday, June 15 2006 @ 04:14 PM PDT

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Over One Year

Recommend Product: NO

We have a bunch of Macs still using Classic to run large More outlines. We were promised that v3.6 would add the old More ability to clone lines - unfortunately, no dice!

Now we're starting to move to MacIntel machines and won't be able to run Classic.

Looks like we'll have to go with TAO (a worthy competitor, but not as user-friendly/easy to use as OmniOutliner).

Unfortunately, Omni has not responded with an update of when cloning will be available either.   
Overall Rating:

Ease of Use:

Support:

Features:

Quality / Stability:

Price:

5 of 10 users found this helpful.

Rate this Review

Was this Review helpful? Yes | No

Comments

3 comments |

STILL no Cloning - UGH - CharPatton

Agree with above; cloning is a crucial feature for many of us who still rely on the incredibly useful MORE. Last I heard from the developers, cloning wasn't on the horizon until v4.x, unfortunately.

Reply to This

Saturday, June 24 2006 @ 12:20 PM PDT


STILL no Cloning - UGH - pvonk46

Cloning - is this worth taking off 4 stars??? Emotion has taken over!!

Reply to This

Wednesday, August 30 2006 @ 04:31 PM PDT


Why would there be, in a minor version? - Stormchild

Seems a bit silly to expect a significant new feature in a minor version update. Although Omni hasn't promised to add it, they have certainly acknowledged that it's a highly requested feature (check out the forum on their website). In any case, if a particular application doesn't have a feature you need, simply don't use it and find something that does meet your needs. That's really no reason to give this a poor rating, as it's an excellent product for what it's intended to do, and can hardly be called "terrible" for merely not having one feature you want.

Reply to This

Wednesday, September 20 2006 @ 09:18 PM PDT