Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

  |    |    |  No luck with FLAC

Version:  

   [ Views: 1036 ]

No luck with FLAC

Feedback Type:  Review

Contributed by: ffooky Tuesday, May 09 2006 @ 02:38 PM PDT

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Less than a month

Recommend Product: YES


Running 10.3.9 and QT 7.0.4 FLAC files will not open with QT:

"QuickTime cannot open the file: "Don't Be Like That.flac"
it is not a file that QuickTime understands (-2048)"

The FLAC to iTunes script works beautifully but will only convert the first track in a folder:

"A descriptor type mismatch ocurred"

I made sure to restart after installing the .pkg.   

1 of 1 users found this helpful.

Rate this Review

Was this Review helpful? Yes | No

Comments

4 comments |

No luck with FLAC - snoogly

Same for me - shame, I it got my hopes up!

Now I have to delete it all... :-(

Reply to This

Wednesday, May 10 2006 @ 02:08 AM PDT


No luck with FLAC - snoogly

By the way, what FLAC to iTunes script are you talking about?

Reply to This

Wednesday, May 10 2006 @ 02:20 AM PDT


No luck with FLAC - arkadini

XiphQT does support FLAC decoding, however at the moment (as stated in the release notes on the project's website) it can only import Ogg FLAC file format. Native FLAC format support should be ready soon. (It's possible your .flac files ARE actually Ogg files - try renaming them .ogg and see if it works. If not - you will have to wait.)

Reply to This

Wednesday, May 10 2006 @ 03:27 AM PDT


No luck with FLAC - ffooky


I think it might be better always to put the all important ogg- in front of the FLAC if that's the case :-)

snoogly - I did searh on my system for anything with FLAC in the name after installation and came across a new script in iTunes, which must have been installed with the whole package. It seemed like the answer to my prayers...flaac keeps the tags but uses faac and Toast uses the QT encoders but loses tags.

I suppose I could put each track in a separate folder before conversion...heheh.

Reply to This

Wednesday, May 10 2006 @ 10:00 AM PDT