Shutterbug, or ? - tom2000tomson

I compared Shutterbug with Rapidweaver!

Had a page with RW, but after having "nothing" in a windows IE6 browser but text (all design was gone), I completely changed to Shutterbug.

sutterbug 2.0
+ complete easy customizable design, built-in designs
+ consistent design
+ php support
+ built-in password protection
+ best cross platform browser compatibility
+ rss support
- no plug-ins needed, xtra-boxes do all the magic
(-+) extra page functionality has to be added by adding html or php code, which is good for advanced users, who knows html or php
(-+) no built-in email script fuction, but a script is provided by xtralean, which is fully customizable
- no built-in news/blog system (only rss)


rapidweaver 3.2
+ built-in news/blog system with rss
+ plug-in structure for future functionality, for free and commercial plug-ins
+ php support
+ built-in page plug-in for page email script
- email script is somehow customizable, working design depends on used template, no chance of changing mail-exploit
- browser compatibility depends on the design template
- design of the website is restricted to programmers and third party templates
- design templates are not always consitent in design
- own design is hard XML work

hope this helps.

Reply to This

Friday, March 31 2006 @ 03:02 AM PST

Shutterbug, or ? - ZX81

Thanks a lot ; I did not expect such a complete reply. Very grateful.

Reply to This

Friday, March 31 2006 @ 04:36 AM PST

thanks - sjk

Just wanted to add my thanks for your comparison summary.

Reply to This

Friday, May 05 2006 @ 04:10 PM PDT