I am using software not only for private tasks but occasionally I write reviews for a magazine. I need to update all my Mac Os software. So I am working with Mac Os x.4.5 on an imac g5, about 6 momths old.
I have noticed that fontexplorer doesnot like applications like suitcase, and it conflicts with suitcase extensions. Anyone who has gone into fontmanaging with other applications should first uninstall these and remove extensions or kext.files belonging to these applications.
I have no problems whatsoever running fontexplorer on an imac g5 and have advised people to download this tool.
FontExplorer X
Professional font management utility.
Version: 1.2.3
Use this instead of Suitcase - ungeziefer
While I haven't yet tried the newest version of Suitcase ("Suitcase Fusion"), from what I've seen thus far I'd have to say that FontExplorer gives Suitcase a very strong run for its money. For right now I'd recommend using FontExplorer instead -- not only is it free (in Beta), but it's fast, hassle-free and straight-forward yet does everything you need it to. Saves all your fonts in one central location (if you so choose), which can be anywhere you like, so having a ton of fonts does not slow you down when starting up or logging in (unless, I suppose, you have every single font activated . . .).It's stable. It works. It's great.
Am also using You Software's "YouControlFonts" -- another gem -- and had some issues with that; but if you heed the advice of the FontExplorer program and clear the "font caches," then log out and back in, all is well again.
I've been trying different font apps, trying to find the best one. And while it's frustrating (now that I've installed Suitcase, FontExplorer doesn't like that very much), on some level you have to be impressed with the Mac OS and these apps -- in that you can have FontBook and Suitcase and Font Explorer and YouControlFonts running at the same time, without a total meltdown . . .
Anyway, give this a try. You won't regret it.
(Also: I'm running OS 10.4.5 without any problems. Not using Quark 6.5, however, so can't vouch for compatibility on that.)
Peace.
Reply to This
Friday, March 10 2006 @ 11:09 PM PST