Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

  |    |    |  Variable autoeject not defined...?

Version:  

   [ Views: 1113 ]

Variable autoeject not defined...?

Feedback Type:  Troubleshooting Report

Contributed by: versiontracker344 Tuesday, January 17 2006 @ 02:15 AM PST

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Less than a month

Hey gang,

downloaded + installed FinderCleaner, and tried to run it on my MMC-card for my camera. Asks for admin-pwd, then whirrs a little - then comes back with a "Variable autoeject not defined" message, where you can click OK - and nothing happens? Is this the eject-problem mentioned in earlier versions?

I'm running OS X 10.4.4 on a 1.5 GhZ PB with 1.5 GB RAM...   
System Info:

Rate this Troubleshooting Report

Was this Troubleshooting Report helpful? Yes | No

Comments

4 comments |

Variable autoeject not defined...? - trekvogel

When did you download this version? Seems you have a broken one. Try downloading it again or contact me for a good version and it should work fine.

Reply to This

Friday, January 20 2006 @ 02:17 PM PST


Variable autoeject not defined...? - melonious

I get the same error when trying to "clean" a mounted network volume (from a PC). I've just redownloaded the dmg from the developer's website and still the same result.

As a small note to the developer, maybe you should change the text on your site to read FinderCleaner 1.9 rather than 1.8. Also perhaps include the build number in the filename of the dmg (i.e. findercleaner1.9.dmg rather than just findercleaner.dmg every time).

Other than that, thanks.

Reply to This

Sunday, January 22 2006 @ 11:45 AM PST


Variable autoeject not defined...? - trekvogel

It's working fine again, something went wrong at my hosting provider.

Reply to This

Wednesday, February 01 2006 @ 12:59 PM PST


Variable autoeject not defined...? - versiontracker344

Hey Trekvogel,

downloaded new version as you recommended, and now it works beautifully - thanks again for this great app! :-D

Reply to This

Thursday, February 16 2006 @ 08:49 AM PST