Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Audio / Video  |  Converters  |  JES Deinterlacer  |  Inverse Telecine doesn't work

JES Deinterlacer

JES Deinterlacer

Deinterlaces QuickTime movies.

Version:  3.5.4

   [ Views: 1367 ]

Inverse Telecine doesn't work

Feedback Type:  Review

Contributed by: Hannibal Fortune Tuesday, November 15 2005 @ 02:07 PM PST

Product Platform: MacOS,MacOSX

Used Product For: 6-12 months

Recommend Product: NO

I always get the same errors when trying to use inverse telecine to recreate 24fps film rate from 30fps captures. It will say that the "top field first" option is wrong and I should try the opposite setting. Except the opposite setting results in the same message! There are only two settings, after all. On the extremely rare occasion I don't get that message, JES quits soon after and doesn't produce any usable files. Maybe this works fine for simple deinterlacing, but I just can't recommend it for inverse telecine. However, if I only needed simple deinterlacing, I would use something like ffmpegX. That has a deinterlace option and would let me encode to Xvid or h.264 in the same pass, so there's no additional loss from later re-encoding. As of right now, I have to sadly say that there's still no inverse telecine solution for the Mac, which is a damn shame for a platform that's supposed to be so video-friendly.   
Overall Rating:

Ease of Use:

Support:

Features:

Quality / Stability:

Price:

0 of 2 users found this helpful.

Rate this Review

Was this Review helpful? Yes | No

Comments

4 comments |

Inverse Telecine doesn't work - Jan_E.Schotsman_827

It would help if you would report this to the author and provide a test movie.

Jan E. (author)

Reply to This

Thursday, April 06 2006 @ 01:09 PM PDT


Inverse Telecine doesn't work - beachstdes

have a go with the new Compression Master at www.popwire.com. the feature inverse telecine is in there together with a lot of other interesting features.
free demo

Reply to This

Wednesday, May 10 2006 @ 07:33 AM PDT


What Did You Expect!? - schneb`

So let me see if I get this straight. A free utility does not do what you want it to do, so you give it a poor rating. Instead, you find satisfaction with a $495 application? Man, there is something terribly wrong with that.

Reply to This

Wednesday, July 26 2006 @ 01:49 PM PDT


What Did You Expect!? - Hannibal Fortune

I expect an application to do what it says it does, which in this case is inverse telecine. If something is free, does that mean I should give it five stars just because it does anything at all? And BTW, on the Windows side, there are free applications that do inverse telecine, including AutoGK. So what's your problem, too much time on your hands so you complain about others without doing your research?

Reply to This

Wednesday, July 26 2006 @ 07:43 PM PDT