Existing users, 
The price is the only nice thing about this product. It's unusable for me as I need login/password authentication. NAT-Traversal is also important for me while travelling (hotel rooms, public hot spots etc.).
I suggest using VPN Tracker when you are seriously relying on VPN connectivity for business purposes. Using VPN Tracker I was able to setup the connection to our SonicWALL firewall in <5 minutes whereas with IPsecuritas I needed 10 minutes just to realize that it doesn't offer login/password authentication.
IPSecuritas
Set up secure IPSec VPN tunnels.
Version: 3.4
No login/password authentication, no NAT-T. Better use VPN Tracker
Feedback Type: Review
Contributed by: MMarcel Monday, October 03 2005 @ 09:02 AM PDT
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: 1-6 months
Recommend Product: NO
Overall Rating:
Ease of Use:
Support:
Features:
Quality / Stability:
Comments
No login/password authentication, no NAT-T. Better use VPN Tracker - info504
It's not IPSecuritas fauls that IPSec doesn't support passwords based login...You could also have your Admin asked ot configure the FireWall in an IPSec only mode without L2PT authentification...
Sunday, January 14 2007 @ 07:16 AM PST
No login/password authentication, no NAT-T. Better use VPN Tracker - w i n t e r m u t e
The new version, v.3, has these options and more.Reply to This
Friday, July 07 2006 @ 11:12 AM PDT