Existing users, 
This company continues to tout the features of their 2.0 release, but have yet to support Tiger. They continue to provide the lame excuse that they're working on it. Having purchased the product expecting OS support, I'm left with a crippled product. I strong discourage anyone from purchasing from this company as poor support has been a hallmark of every version of Groupcal.
Version 1.0 was consistently buggy, and I had to basically destroy my exchange account and restart from scratch to get it to work. 2.0 addressed those problems for about 3 months, until I made the mistake of upgrading to Tiger. If you have to spend 6 months out of your support cycle waiting for bug fixes, consider what you're getting for your money.
Please don't give these people money. You won't be happy.
Groupcal
manage Exchange calendars in iCal
Version: 3.94
No update since tiger
Feedback Type: Review
Contributed by: SFLeeTucker Wednesday, September 14 2005 @ 11:05 AM PDT
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Over One Year
Recommend Product: NO
Overall Rating:
Ease of Use:
Support:
Features:
Quality / Stability:
Price:
Comments
No update since tiger - alanralanr
Looks like it's a canned response. I got the same message last week.Thursday, September 15 2005 @ 06:20 PM PDT
No update since tiger - gander2112_dotmac
Got a lot of responses like that during the 2.0 cycle.I use entorugare 99% of the time now, and bounce to VirtualPC/Outlook when I need to book a resource.
I will give this a throw, since I bought it way back, but I am not too hopeful.
Geoff
Saturday, September 24 2005 @ 08:10 AM PDT
No update since tiger - Maat
Some of us are still keeping our fingers crossed. There's no real alternative out there (apart from using entourage).This came to me just yesterday...
"We should have a solution for you in about a week or so. Thank you for your patience and support."
of course this was after the 5-6 weeks they promised me earlier had passed, and that again was after they'd promised an update (or at least news about it) much earlier.
Still, when it worked it was a great product, and once they get their act together I'll keep using it.
Reply to This
Thursday, September 15 2005 @ 02:24 AM PDT