Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  System / Utilities  |  Backup / Sync / Recover  |  LaCie SilverKeeper  |  OS9 great! OSX Yuck!

LaCie SilverKeeper

LaCie SilverKeeper

Automate the backup functions of your storage devices.

Version:  1.1.4

   [ Views: 715 ]

OS9 great! OSX Yuck!

Feedback Type:  Review

Contributed by: mulder Monday, August 22 2005 @ 05:02 PM PDT

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Over One Year

Recommend Product: NO

I run both, OS 9.2 and OS 10.3.9 on separate machines. I use silverkeeper on both.

On OS 9.2 it has always worked flawlessly.

On OS 10.3.9 i have two Lacie 160GB firewire 800 drives daisy chained into one firewire port and silverkeeper can never accomplish a complete backup between these two drives without stalling and, ultimately, crashing. I have to force quit the program ... and even force quitting doesn't eliminate the program from my desktop so i have to force shut down the entire computer.

Yes, i have done all the usual maintenance on my G5 (rebuilding directories, prebinding, etc) and the "ignore owndership" button on the destination volume is NOT checked.

I wouldn't recommend silverkeeper for OS 10.3.9.

Paul   
Overall Rating:

Ease of Use:

Support:

Features:

Quality / Stability:

Price:

1 of 1 users found this helpful.

Rate this Review

Was this Review helpful? Yes | No

Comments

2 comments |

RE: OS9 great! OSX Yuck! - Mike - LaCie

There are improvements in the FireWire driver made by Apple in OS X 10.4.x

One of the issues corrected by Apple was improvement of copying between two FireWire drives.

Mike
LaCie

Reply to This

Monday, September 12 2005 @ 09:20 AM PDT


OS9 great! OSX Yuck! - chembob

Odd, I've had no problem whatsoever and I have regularly run it under various flavors of Tiger. In fact, it saved me when I had a hard drive failure on my PowerBook three days after a full backup to a 160 GB external firewire drive. I appreciate it that they are providing this program to us for free.

ChemBob

Reply to This

Monday, September 12 2005 @ 09:29 AM PDT