I was a bit intrigued by this program, so I took a look at their website.
See how well Solitaire and WordPad run under Windows 2000! :)
A real-world test is critical, accompanied by benchmarks. I want to see how well Office runs on this. I want to see how well a newer game like Quake 3 can run (if at all). For this to be viable, we need to see some
That being said, I am very aware that a PC emulator will more than likely be too slow to allow you do run anything more than basic apps.
iEmulator
PC emulator
Version: 1.7.9
Demos are not based on real-use situations
Feedback Type: Commentary
Contributed by: -=Someone=- Saturday, December 04 2004 @ 11:30 AM PST
Product Platform: MacOSX
Used Product For: Have Not Tried
Recommend Product: YES
Comments
Quake 3 is not a real-use situation either - Mike Waterfall SW
First of all, he said real-WORLD, not real-USE. They mean two very different things. Quake 3 would be a good test because it would actually show how fast the emulator is. WordPad won't show much of a difference in speed between a 200 MHz computer and a 2 GHz computer since it doesn't do much in the first place.And what do you mean by people don't play games in emulators? What's the point of the other 99% of emulators that aren't emulating PCs, like Super Nintendo and Atari?
Saturday, December 04 2004 @ 06:05 PM PST
Demos are not based on real-use situations - -=Someone=-
FYI, Quake 3 is often used for benchmarking purposes. It has nothing to do whether or not it's available for Mac. It's about testing the number of frames per second you can get. And yes, some people do play games on their PC emulator. There are games not available for Mac that they like to run. Sometimes they are playable, but most often they are a nightmare.Wednesday, December 15 2004 @ 12:45 PM PST
Quake 3 is not a real-use situation either - Stormchild
Why would you run Quake 3 in an emulator when you can get the product for the Mac? Doesn't sound like real-use to me. It's also well known that nobody tries to run games in an emulator. They're just too slow for that kind of thing.Reply to This
Saturday, December 04 2004 @ 11:55 AM PST