Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Design / Graphics  |  Publishing  |  CMYK Production +  |  *cough*Photoshop?*cough*

CMYK Production +

CMYK Production +

normalize a batch of images to CMYK

Version:  2.0.1

   [ Views: 736 ]

*cough*Photoshop?*cough*

Feedback Type:  Commentary

Contributed by: BEIGE Wednesday, October 20 2004 @ 11:44 AM PDT

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Have Not Tried

Recommend Product: NO

not to be a bummer but i have a Photoshop droplet on my desktop that does this. It's a program by Adobe - check it out some time.   

1 of 2 users found this helpful.

Rate this Commentary

Was this Commentary helpful? Yes | No

Comments

4 comments |

i take it back - BEIGE

after playing with this for a while, i can say that it does produce punchier CMYK output than Photoshop.

Reply to This

Friday, July 22 2005 @ 10:31 AM PDT


i take it back - BEIGE

after playing with this for a while, i can say that it does produce punchier CMYK output than Photoshop. a little contrasty in places but definitely good for rich colours. I just wish the UI wasn't so limited. you can't even zoom.

Reply to This

Friday, July 22 2005 @ 10:36 AM PDT


i take it back - Gotham City Mayor

you cant zoom but I can go to the beach while it works for me
I bought it and I am really happy
try converting an rgb in photoshop with for example Euroscale v2
then do the same in this version (and choose only CMYK, no correction) and click optmize profile: seems that the software makes a much better conversion, almost no lost at all, red is red etc
interesting

Reply to This

Friday, July 29 2005 @ 08:29 AM PDT


I would do the same - Gotham City Mayor

you cant zoom but I can go to the beach while it works for me
I bought it and I am really happy
try converting an rgb in photoshop with for example Euroscale v2
then do the same in this version (and choose only CMYK, no correction) and click optmize profile: seems that the software makes a much better conversion, almost no lost at all, red is red etc
interesting

Reply to This

Friday, July 29 2005 @ 08:30 AM PDT