Existing users, log in.  New users, create a free account.  Lost password?

Mac OS X  |  Design / Graphics  |  Image Edit / Optimize / Convert  |  PStill  |  PStill vs 10.3

PStill

PStill

PDF magic and converts/combines EPS/PS to PDF

Version:  5.7.5

   [ Views: 1303 ]

PStill vs 10.3

Feedback Type:  Commentary

Contributed by: mbtoloczko Wednesday, May 19 2004 @ 07:37 AM PDT

Product Platform: MacOSX

Used Product For: Over One Year

Recommend Product: YES

PStill is much more versatile than the built-in distiller in 10.3. Distilling options such as image resolution, image compression, font embedding, and security are all accessible in PStill. None of these are available with the OS X 10.3 built-in distiller. I use the built-in distiller for some simple jobs, but when I need clean, compact PDF files from large documents with images, I use PStill.   

0 of 1 users found this helpful.

Rate this Commentary

Was this Commentary helpful? Yes | No

Comments

1 comments |

PStill vs 10.3 - wgscott

more options than ghostscript? That is the "built-in" distiller.

Reply to This

Wednesday, May 19 2004 @ 12:24 PM PDT