Guys, I know this could be used for SPAM, but allow it it's dues. We manage mailing lists for around fifteen clients who we send monthly/quarterly html-rich newsletters for to their mailing-groups. All the people on their lists have requested to be, and we are always responsible about removing any people who request to be removed. This tool, along with quite a few others (DirectMail being another) which are often called 'SPAM tools', are genuinely useful products with a definitively legal, non-aggresive use.
In future, try not to take out frustrations on the developers for what some people may use the product for; I'd imagine 90% of the developers of software like this intend for it to be used for legal, ethical purposes. Just my two cents.
eMailerX
strip/collect addresses from text files & manage lists
Version: 2.9.5
Not a spam-tool.... - Stranger
All well & good, but unfortunately not everyone who download, and use this program are people sending emails to consensual clients. I'm not dissing the program, how it was written, or how it works. I AM VERY concerned with what it does. If it could be written in such a way that it would be impossible, or even extremely hard for spammers, and un-consensual "bulk" email, then fine.Actually I guess I'm a little hot on this subject after losing two good email addresses I have had for over 3 years due to excessive spam & junk, even after installing anti-spam software. I was EXTRA careful about how I used my email address, so I know the only way my addys were "up for grabs" was through programs like this. If this program could ONLY be used in an honest fashion, then I will wait in line to give it 5 stars (provided it does what it says), until then I have nothing but contempt for this, and anything like it. BTW....respect to those who use it in an honest manner.
Spam: To mass-mail UNREQUESTED, identical or nearly-identical email messages, particularly those containing advertising. Especially used when the mail addresses have been culled from network traffic or databases without the consent of the recipients.
Reply to This
Sunday, May 25 2003 @ 07:08 PM PDT