ICQ 2001b - 5.15b3640Popular messaging client |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| Version 5.15b3640: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews
Troubleshooting
Usage Tips
Developer Notes
Commentary
Featured Reviews
feature request 



- Version: 5.03.2315, 4/8/2005 07:50PM PST
(1 of 2 users found this comment useful)
zerointegerMost Recent Replies: View All 1 Replies
- Being a Parent
The file sharing… - Version: 5.17b3642, 11/14/2001 01:14PM PST
(1 of 1 users found this comment useful)
BruxBox
feature is unique among all instant messengers. I've used this along with Morpheus, and it a very complementary technology for sharing files. Also, have you noticed that AOL TW hardly ever recites the true number of ICQ users? It would dwarf the number of AOL IM users.
If you going… - Version: 5.15b3640, 11/9/2001 11:18AM PST
isteve
to post a new ICQ version every week please tell us "WHAT'S NEW " with it . Don't waste our time without it . Thanks
I realize there may implications to doing something like this such as abuse by anyone having a particular bias against another but with the ability (according the aim sdk) to read the contents of chat session window without user interaction, I can forsee a system where the conversation in question can be processed and assigned a severity level to help drive traffic down, I can also see a disclaimer for the user that is flagging the conversation to have to agree that the concern is a valid one.