Existing users, 
 WinRAR - 3.80 Beta 5compress & decompress RAR, ZIP & other files |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
Feedback Summary:
| Version 3.80 Beta 5: | |||||
| Overall Rating: | Not rated (0.0) | Features: | Not rated (0.0) | Support: | Not rated (0.0) |
| Ease of Use: | Not rated (0.0) | Quality / Stability: | Not rated (0.0) | Price: | Not rated (0.0) |
Key to Types of Feedback:
Reviews 
Troubleshooting 
Usage Tips 
Developer Notes 
Commentary 
Featured Reviews
Winrar 3.80 Beta 5 Please I need help. - Version: 3.80 Beta 5, 9/11/2008 12:49PM PST
(0 of 1 users found this comment useful)
squirtmph
Cool archiver 
- Version: 3.61, 9/24/2006 11:20PM PST
(2 of 2 users found this comment useful)
pd_alm
Very good archiver, execellent compression, nice additional features
Unmatched in quality and performance - Version: 3.50 beta 7, 8/24/2005 05:23AM PST
(9 of 9 users found this comment useful)
Zaine Ridling
Simply the best, most reliable archiver around. In the next version it will support 7z file creation. Most of my RAR files are 4.4G on DVD, and I've tested larger files for the heck of it with no problems. Like others, WinRAR offers so many options, and being a mature program and format, it's rock solid.
There is very little difference between 7z Ultra vs. RAR Best, and when creating solid archives, RAR wins out every time. 1G game file was compressed to 501M using 7z Ultra (7-Zip) and took 5:55, whereas WinRAR Best compressed the same 1G file to 505M but only took 1:52 — less than two minutes, and less than a 1% difference in file size (on my 3.4GHz machine). Run your own tests. And in the next version, Roshal has plans to support 7z creation, thus continuing WinRAR's tradition of giving users the best of both worlds.
There is very little difference between 7z Ultra vs. RAR Best, and when creating solid archives, RAR wins out every time. 1G game file was compressed to 501M using 7z Ultra (7-Zip) and took 5:55, whereas WinRAR Best compressed the same 1G file to 505M but only took 1:52 — less than two minutes, and less than a 1% difference in file size (on my 3.4GHz machine). Run your own tests. And in the next version, Roshal has plans to support 7z creation, thus continuing WinRAR's tradition of giving users the best of both worlds.
* WINDOWS XP Home edition Pack 3 Version 2002
Browser:
*IE 7
- Once I installed WinRAR, I locate the file where I have stored.
And I double click in the field. (The file shows: CODEC-mpg)
- I click to EXTRACT to new Folder and I click OK
- A tab shows me this:
*Process all files
*Process selected files
- I choose:
*Process al Files
- And after waiting to load up it show me:
*Extract - 20%
Processes - 99%
And Give this window it says
* NEXT VOLUME IS REQUIRED
I DON REMEBER WHAT NUMER OF r and # GIVE ME HERE?
But I was available to play some of the video I wanted to extract.
I have two files I am hoping be available to open them, the code are.
AVI
REAL VIDEO vbr
I am really lost here, first time user, so I am not really sure what to do here, I did fiend allot software I was support be need, which is:
VLCfree-8676.exe
VCDgear355.zip
VLCfree-8676 it’s attached to WinRAR, I believe.
Any help on this matter, I really appreciate whit my deep gratitude, thank you for taking your time, and helping me out.
Squirt
So how can I open it this File it was suppose to be in .RAR?